dowlingm
Senior Member
It's a shame that TTC couldn't spend some cash on decent hoarding along the alignment and at intersections rather than the cheapass fencing and road posts. But that would be a frill I suppose...
TTC has no control over Cherry St other than doing the construction.It's a shame that TTC couldn't spend some cash on decent hoarding along the alignment and at intersections rather than the cheapass fencing and road posts. But that would be a frill I suppose...
It looks lazy. Look at how Metrolinx put promotional hoarding around the Eglinton (surface) bus terminal. The hoarding could have been repurposed elsewhere if it was generic enough.TTC has no control over Cherry St other than doing the construction.
Standard fencing found around construct projects and can't see why you want to waste money on short term protection thanks to the Pan AM Games.
Thats an TTC fencing not Metrolinx since that is TTC land.It looks lazy. Look at how Metrolinx put promotional hoarding around the Eglinton (surface) bus terminal. The hoarding could have been repurposed elsewhere if it was generic enough.
The fencing is all coming down very soon and probably belongs to Infrastructure Ontario as they are the main folks responsible for the West Don Lands at the moment. It hardly seems sensible to spend $$ on temporary fencing and if they had I bet people would (rightly) have complained.It's a shame that TTC couldn't spend some cash on decent hoarding along the alignment and at intersections rather than the cheapass fencing and road posts. But that would be a frill I suppose...
I'd assume it belongs to their prime contractor on the West Donlands - or perhaps more likely, one of the prime's subs.The fencing is all coming down very soon and probably belongs to Infrastructure Ontario as they are the main folks responsible for the West Don Lands at the moment. It hardly seems sensible to spend $$ on temporary fencing and if they had I bet people would (rightly) have complained.
Does it really matter who owns it? It's temporary fencing that will presumably be removed in next few days or weeks when the West Don Lands 'opens". It may not meet our usual high aesthetic standards but ....I'd assume it belongs to their prime contractor on the West Donlands - or perhaps more likely, one of the prime's subs.
The entire discussion seems like a bizarre waste of time, and I don't know the point of it.Does it really matter who owns it? It's temporary fencing that will presumably be removed in next few days or weeks when the West Don Lands 'opens". It may not meet our usual high aesthetic standards but ....
Drum saw the 504 bus not a 514 streetcar. The 504 bus used to loop at Parliament and now I think they are going east to Cherry before looping back. If we had any streetcars we would not have bus replacements!that was quick. didnt look close to in service on sunday when i went by.
Checking the TTC list of accessible routes - the only routes listed as accessible is 510 and 317. Right now there are 14 Flexities on 510 - and nothing else. The worst I've seen in a long time is 2/3rd Flexities - given the frequency of this route, it is accessible.Given the lack of deliveries at Hillcrest they should just call them 514s and announce the new route is "beginning early!" as opposed to the repeated announcements of "accessible routes!" still largely served by A/CLRV