44 North
Senior Member
Thanks for the info.
But I would not be so sure about the preferences of the locals. That area has surprisingly high transit usage, even from the low-rise segments. My observations are pre-covid, but I expect everything to be about same post-covid.
Bus # 53 could depart the Finch Stn being full, and by the time it reaches Steeles, it would be only 3/4 or 2/3 full. Many locals would alight at the stops between Finch and Steeles. Bus # 125 could depart full and remain full untill it turns from Yonge to Drewry, but remain only 1/3 full by the time it reaches Bathurst. I didn't have a chance to observe # 42 Cummer, but wouldn't be surprised if quite a few of its riders board at Finch and alight by the time it reaches Bayview.
So, the situation might be quite different from the one around the would-be Willowdale station at Sheppard. If many locals rely on transit already, they will probably want a station.
I think the locals are fine with a station. It was in the City's plans for well over a decade with little to no noted concern by residents. The issue is now there's no station... but we'll have to lobby for it (with only one being chosen)? Reading the Supplementary Analysis it comes across as an episode of the bachelor or something. Is it worth the effort to get tangled into that kind of political game?
Still want to bring home the lack of a bridge. It says in the report they'll be going at a "significant depth" under the river. We know a bridge works. We know the province previously stated they don't want to tunnel below the same river. So how deep is "significant"?