Lovestallthings
Active Member
They seem to be working pretty fast on this floor.
Like I said, the cost to finance a project that takes this many years to complete are exceptionally high. Almost always to the degree that the project is a failure. The return on investment you have to offer a lender on a project with a payback period of 6,7 or 8 years (at this rate of construction) has to be so high the project would never return a profit to the developer (and this ain't no hugely capitalized developer to boot). Hence, I'm highly suspicious of this project. Often when things don't appear to add up, that's because they don't. Personally I've never seen a project that returns a satisfactory rate of return when payback periods excced 3.5 years, but real estate is a little lower risk than I deal with so lets push real estate to 4.5-5 years. After that you've got an 'ugly baby' no matter how you spin it. Hope that better explains why I think something crocked is going on here.
PS. I'd also appreciate it if you kept the disparaging comments to yourself. There is no need to personalize with comments like 'lots of words'.
They seem to be working pretty fast on this floor.
They are indeed moving much faster than they were relative to previous floors. The last slab pour was back on Nov 22 though which means it's already been 3 weeks and I'd imagine we still have a good bit to go before they're ready to pour the next floor.They seem to be working pretty fast on this floor.
The workers didn't hesitate to use the roof of the Rogers store to complete some of the work thoughRight that Roger store makes me wonder, even if the owner was asking for $10 million, it would make sense because it would make the site way less space constrained.
The repetitive floors won't speed up until they're...repeated.They are indeed moving much faster than they were relative to previous floors. The last slab pour was back on Nov 22 though which means it's already been 3 weeks and I'd imagine we still have a good bit to go before they're ready to pour the next floor.
So yes much faster than previously but certainly not breakneck speed by any means.
They are indeed moving much faster than they were relative to previous floors. The last slab pour was back on Nov 22 though which means it's already been 3 weeks and I'd imagine we still have a good bit to go before they're ready to pour the next floor.
So yes much faster than previously but certainly not breakneck speed by any means.
I think the key phrase here is "getting into a routine". That is, when the floors design becomes repeatable while getting down the method of building those floors to an art form, this thing will likely start to grow notably. Thusly, patience young Padawans...The repetitive floors won't speed up until they're...repeated.
No doubt this is taking longer than typical but to assume something dodgy or shady is going on is just speculation.Like I said, the cost to finance a project that takes this many years to complete are exceptionally high. Almost always to the degree that the project is a failure. The return on investment you have to offer a lender on a project with a payback period of 6,7 or 8 years (at this rate of construction) has to be so high the project would never return a profit to the developer (and this ain't no hugely capitalized developer to boot). Hence, I'm highly suspicious of this project. Often when things don't appear to add up, that's because they don't. Personally I've never seen a project that returns a satisfactory rate of return when payback periods excced 3.5 years, but real estate is a little lower risk than I deal with so lets push real estate to 4.5-5 years. After that you've got an 'ugly baby' no matter how you spin it. Hope that better explains why I think something crocked is going on here.
PS. I'd also appreciate it if you kept the disparaging comments to yourself. There is no need to personalize with comments like 'lots of words'.
The other key will be being able to reuse forms, floor after floor, so they will no longer have to build special forms for each floor, as has been the case so far.I think the key phrase here is "getting into a routine". That is, when the floors design becomes repeatable while getting down the method of building those floors to an art form, this thing will likely start to grow notably. Thusly, patience young Padawans...
Exactly the past couple of floors have been different heights etc. Once they get to the floors that are the same height it will fly upThe other key will be being able to reuse forms, floor after floor, so they will no longer have to build special forms for each floor, as has been the case so far.
42
Like I said, the cost to finance a project that takes this many years to complete are exceptionally high. Almost always to the degree that the project is a failure. The return on investment you have to offer a lender on a project with a payback period of 6,7 or 8 years (at this rate of construction) has to be so high the project would never return a profit to the developer (and this ain't no hugely capitalized developer to boot). Hence, I'm highly suspicious of this project. Often when things don't appear to add up, that's because they don't. Personally I've never seen a project that returns a satisfactory rate of return when payback periods excced 3.5 years, but real estate is a little lower risk than I deal with so lets push real estate to 4.5-5 years. After that you've got an 'ugly baby' no matter how you spin it. Hope that better explains why I think something crocked is going on here.
PS. I'd also appreciate it if you kept the disparaging comments to yourself. There is no need to personalize with comments like 'lots of words'.
Just how much is Apple, err... I mean some future random unknown tenant... paying for that space!?The retail component, which is ~1/3rd of the value of the entire project, will be open and paying rent within a year.
That will take a big bite out of any financing issues. Monthly revenue collected (or out-right sale of the retail space) will more than offset interest on loans.