Toronto The Livmore | 138.68m | 43s | Vertica | IBI Group

More from today.
IMG_2790.jpg
IMG_2789.jpg
IMG_2788.jpg
IMG_2787.jpg
IMG_2786.jpg
IMG_2785.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2790.jpg
    IMG_2790.jpg
    385.3 KB · Views: 359
  • IMG_2789.jpg
    IMG_2789.jpg
    467.7 KB · Views: 360
  • IMG_2788.jpg
    IMG_2788.jpg
    472.6 KB · Views: 306
  • IMG_2787.jpg
    IMG_2787.jpg
    508.1 KB · Views: 379
  • IMG_2786.jpg
    IMG_2786.jpg
    497.2 KB · Views: 366
  • IMG_2785.jpg
    IMG_2785.jpg
    455.2 KB · Views: 370
This building looks promising to me.

I've noticed that many (most?) of the condos in Toronto have only small windows that open rather than larger ones, like the tilt and turn windows common in Europe. Is this just a function of cost, or other codes that make bigger opening windows less common? That was one of things that bothered me about my bedroom when we lived in a condo -- there was a lot of glass, but very little window to open. It felt stuffy.
EuropeanWindows1-300x298.jpg
 

Attachments

  • EuropeanWindows1-300x298.jpg
    EuropeanWindows1-300x298.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 524
This building looks promising to me.

I've noticed that many (most?) of the condos in Toronto have only small windows that open rather than larger ones, like the tilt and turn windows common in Europe. Is this just a function of cost, or other codes that make bigger opening windows less common? That was one of things that bothered me about my bedroom when we lived in a condo -- there was a lot of glass, but very little window to open. It felt stuffy.
View attachment 112358

Don't want it to be too easy for people to jump or fall out.
 
Taken today. Some balcony glass appearing on north and south faces.


Gerrard1.jpg


Gerrard2.jpg


Gerrard3.jpg


Gerrard4.jpg


Looking SW...

Gerrard5.jpg


Looking NE...

Gerrard6.jpg


Gerrard7.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Gerrard1.jpg
    Gerrard1.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 341
  • Gerrard2.jpg
    Gerrard2.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 351
  • Gerrard3.jpg
    Gerrard3.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 365
  • Gerrard4.jpg
    Gerrard4.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 348
  • Gerrard5.jpg
    Gerrard5.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 330
  • Gerrard6.jpg
    Gerrard6.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 362
  • Gerrard7.jpg
    Gerrard7.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 329
This just seems like such a mismatch of materials. I'll withhold judgement till it's closer to completion since I think it could turn out, but right now it just seems like a wide range of quality that it could go either way. Cheap materials always look so much worse when they're beside quality ones, in this case there's varying quality on the same building, or so it seems at the moment. Anyone feeling the same way?
 

Back
Top