Toronto Smart House | 82.6m | 25s | Urban Capital | a—A

Looks to me like the positioning of the coloured glass on the balconies is opposite of the renderings.
 
13B11228-5BFD-40C8-BA51-69E6985EC7F4.jpeg
CD2E055E-C416-4F59-8C70-EEF7CD9AC6A3.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 13B11228-5BFD-40C8-BA51-69E6985EC7F4.jpeg
    13B11228-5BFD-40C8-BA51-69E6985EC7F4.jpeg
    264.1 KB · Views: 523
  • CD2E055E-C416-4F59-8C70-EEF7CD9AC6A3.jpeg
    CD2E055E-C416-4F59-8C70-EEF7CD9AC6A3.jpeg
    211.4 KB · Views: 521
It just looks to me, that nothing else but usual glass cladding. Can you prove me wrong, how come you see it as one of the highest quality cladding?
Do you have some resource that shows superiority of materials used in that construction?

excellent question - i'd like to hear the answer also
 
today: Queen st is a mess with the track work, but also serene without all the traffic.

IMG_20171023_153821.jpg
IMG_20171023_153858.jpg
IMG_20171023_154123.jpg
IMG_20171023_154145.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20171023_153821.jpg
    IMG_20171023_153821.jpg
    169.3 KB · Views: 438
  • IMG_20171023_153858.jpg
    IMG_20171023_153858.jpg
    157.7 KB · Views: 435
  • IMG_20171023_154123.jpg
    IMG_20171023_154123.jpg
    201.7 KB · Views: 429
  • IMG_20171023_154145.jpg
    IMG_20171023_154145.jpg
    141.9 KB · Views: 450
This looks quite good.

Things change so fast! In my head it's still a parking lot.
 
The unclad portions (with the double-height column) remind me a bit of a Paul Rudolph building.
 

Back
Top