TrickyRicky
Senior Member
I think one of the conceptual conflicts of the project is that Libeskind's designs are maybe more suited to institutions where the building it short on content but large in meaning, projects where the building forms an integral part of the expression. I have no trouble with the crystal concept and the bold expression; however it feels forced at the ROM. The ROM's problem is it basically has too much content for a constrained space. This feeling is enhanced by devoting more space to the expression of the building while the galleries themselves are almost embarrassingly cluttered with content and much of the collection sits in storage. Putting the temporary exhibition space in an underground bunker was a necessary solution but it feels wrong down there.
Conceptual fantasy if we set aside the fiscal realities for a moment, one wonders if the ROM is just trying to shoe-horn too many areas of interest under one roof. Splitting up into two institutions covering say natural history and human civilization with only one occupying the current site would allow for the galleries to be reconfigured and let the building breath.
Conceptual fantasy if we set aside the fiscal realities for a moment, one wonders if the ROM is just trying to shoe-horn too many areas of interest under one roof. Splitting up into two institutions covering say natural history and human civilization with only one occupying the current site would allow for the galleries to be reconfigured and let the building breath.