TJ O'Pootertoot
Senior Member
Sounds like there are still some kinks being ironed out with the new accessible seating options...
I was guna post this as, I hope RC fixes this moving forward.
This shot doesn't tell the true story of the contrast.
This is a meaningful point for debate....would the Jays draw 30k and 22k at games 2 & 3 if was open air, or with roof but not an enclosed (like seattle)? I'd say no. With 81 games at home, I'd hazard to guess most fans are less inclined to buy midweek tickets in those first 3 weeks of season when its wet and 6-12*C. Look around league so far, VERY empty midweek parks due to the cold. So for the Jays to build anything but a new, retractable, enclosed park....would probably be a move in the wrong direction from a business perspective. Just, ya know, build one with some glass and sunlight
I took a quick look at a couple of examples (the only comparable ones I think are Milwaukee and Seattle, the rest are in the south I think and I am too lazy to look into all 7 or however many there are).
For the stadium in Milwaukee it is pretty much based on temp 63 Fahrenheit/17.2 Celsius so yesterday it would have been open unless there was a breeze off Lake Michigan or other factors but it seems more to do with fan comfort than other factors. They go into more detail here - https://www.mlb.com/news/brewers-ballpark-roof-opened-or-closed
For Seattle, the roof actually is more like an umbrella so temperature doesnt really come into it, it is all to do with rain - https://www.mlb.com/news/t-mobile-park-roof-and-rain-history
I think a lot of people need to adjust the contrast/brightness on their TV's and/or not use vivid mode on their smartphone cameras. I don't see the amount of garishness (?) on my tv compared to some of the photo's I've seen online.
When I worked there the frequent complaint I received was to actually close the dome!
Some interesting stuff in this article. Sounds like a new stadium in 10 to 15 years is still very much on the table.
As sports teams grab billions in taxpayer funding for stadiums, Blue Jays president explains the strategy behind Rogers Centre renovations
Mark Shapiro praises club owners for support, never considered asking for taxpayer dollars which he says would have been ‘inappropriate’ and ‘unprecedented’www.theglobeandmail.com
And the longer they keep waiting to build a new stadium, the fewer and fewer options they'll have to build in other areas of the city as the city continues to develop. We're not really the kind of city that has the foresight to protect for future builds, so Downsview and the Portlands will be off the table soon enough.
Not that i'm complaining because they'll never beat the location of the current stadium.
It's a non-starter and i'm glad you linked that image because: All that land highlighted in green is TRCA land and it's basically flood plain area. So in other words, nothing really can be developed on that land. The only land that could be developed on that site would be the portion that's owned by the city, which as you can imagine is not optimally suited for a baseball stadium. Theoretically you could probably fit a hockey/basketball arena on that plot as that would be easier to orient, but that wouldnt happen in any of our lifetimes for various reasons.On the note of potential alternative sites to build a new stadium...
Ontario Science Centre Relocation | Ontario Science Centre
Ontario Science Centre Relocation to Ontario Place.www.ontariosciencecentre.ca
TRCA Responds to Ontario Science Centre Announcement
TRCA owns portions of the Ontario Science Centre lands. We have reached out to the Province for clarification on their proposed plans for the Centre.trca.ca
View attachment 556755
With the current Science Centre site slated to close in 2028, I wonder if this site could be an option for the Blue Jays to explore in late 2020s/early 2030s.
There's roughly 80-90 acres of land which would make for plenty of land to develop a sport entertainment district. Also there will be two mass transit options with the Eglinton Crosstown LRT (Yes it will open eventually ) and Ontario Line subway stops.
I'm no expert of course, so take this suggestion with a grain of salt. I'm sure a lot would need to happen for this to become a remotely viable option, but I do think it something that could be an option that Blue Jays and Rogers might end up exploring down the line based off the suggested 10-15 year timeline.
Why would you think it’s the city’s responsibility to keep land available in case the blue jays decide they want to move. It’s the blue jays problem shouldnt they be the ones that are thinking about it. Also what if we saved land at downsview and they were like no thanks we want to be by the lake to have a better view and atmosphere. It’s on the jays to do their due diligence.And the longer they keep waiting to build a new stadium, the fewer and fewer options they'll have to build in other areas of the city as the city continues to develop. We're not really the kind of city that has the foresight to protect for future builds, so Downsview and the Portlands will be off the table soon enough.
Not that i'm complaining because they'll never beat the location of the current stadium.