News   Dec 20, 2024
 3K     9 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.1K     3 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 2K     0 

Toronto Ridiculous NIMBYism thread

The treehouse man will get to keep his giant treehouse thanks to an OMB appeal. He spent $15,000 in legal fees, and will have to make some modifications.


Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 3.42.14 PM.png


https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/20...llowed-to-keep-big-ship-shaped-treehouse.html
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 3.42.14 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-01-09 at 3.42.14 PM.png
    987.6 KB · Views: 376
I appreciate that people want to preserve the winding character of the street. But right now it looks like crappy patched asphalt in the photos in that article. And of course the residents on one hand are complaining that the street is a highway, but on the other hand claiming their street has a bucolic feel - which is it, folks? And of course they don't want sidewalks. Of course.
 
I appreciate that people want to preserve the winding character of the street. But right now it looks like crappy patched asphalt in the photos in that article. And of course the residents on one hand are complaining that the street is a highway, but on the other hand claiming their street has a bucolic feel - which is it, folks? And of course they don't want sidewalks. Of course.

I believe the term you are looking for is heritage parkway. Because mansions along the FN trail is exactly how to respect the former. Let's ask them.

AoD
 
"Coun. Sarah Doucette, who represents the neighbourhood, agreed "it is a highway now. We're trying to change that.""

People clinging onto a car-oriented lifestyle are complaining that some roads are becoming highways? Not all of the city can be cul-de-sacs and loops.
 
"Coun. Sarah Doucette, who represents the neighbourhood, agreed "it is a highway now. We're trying to change that.""

People clinging onto a car-oriented lifestyle are complaining that some roads are becoming highways? Not all of the city can be cul-de-sacs and loops.

But their street feels like it's in the country!!
 
[...] Cabbagetown NIMBYs are trying, for a second time, to get the bike share station removed from Riverdale Park. [...]

The bike rake is situated along Winchester, in the park and in close proximity to the main entrance to Riverdale Zoo and the cemetery, all potential destinations for people using bike share. But by all means let's move it to the other side of the park, near the parking lot, so that it can detract from someone else's street.
 
The bike rake is situated along Winchester, in the park and in close proximity to the main entrance to Riverdale Zoo and the cemetery, all potential destinations for people using bike share. But by all means let's move it to the other side of the park, near the parking lot, so that it can detract from someone else's street.

But "heritage".

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
But "heritage".

Well, yes. The bike rack clearly detracts from the character, rhythm and overall setting of the area. Happily, the nearby benches, picnic tables and fire hydrants are all heritage structures themselves, so they fit in much more nicely with the cultural heritage landscape.
 
Well, yes. The bike rack clearly detracts from the character, rhythm and overall setting of the area. Happily, the nearby benches, picnic tables and fire hydrants are all heritage structures themselves, so they fit in much more nicely with the cultural heritage landscape.

To be fair, they also opposed a splash pad because its blue umbrella "isn't even a heritage colour". But they also went ape-shit over a proposed homeless shelter, which I would argue that it respects the neighbourhoods heritage of being a historically poor community.
 

Back
Top