AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Not necessarily
There are always exceptions, but I am not that interested in drafting policies for the exceptions.
AoD
Not necessarily
Honestly one doesn't need to be educated on jaywalking - they have been taught since they're a kid. Seeing someone getting ticketed for jaywalking on the other hand will educate them that the cops are watching, and they can be the ones getting dinged next time (it not ever happening is the reason behind the fact that no one follows that rule).
AoD
I biked today also along QQ. I was going quite slowly because of one member of my group who is NOT fast. I used to get angry at the pedestrians that wandered in the bike path, but going really slowly, I realized just how subtle all the markings are. I think many of them are tourists who just do not understand how the street works. The design is just too subtle to be safe.I biked down to QQ this morning. There is a very new element to all these new biking ROWs. If we assume everyone is at QQ to poke around, then why not dawdle and run into the bike path? If the bike path is all of a sudden, a bike "road", then that is something else together. It really does not help that the pedestrian signal activators are on the LRT ROW side. Even if you are law abiding, you have had to traverse the bike path one way or another. This is a very different bike path than found elsewhere in the city.
Honestly one doesn't need to be educated on jaywalking - they have been taught since they're a kid. Seeing someone getting ticketed for jaywalking on the other hand will educate them that the cops are watching, and they can be the ones getting dinged next time (it not ever happening is the reason behind the fact that no one follows that rule).
AoD
Exactly. One guy slowed down, then went around all the stopped bikes and ran the red anyway. One of the cops shouted: "It's red!!" and his face was "oh shit, I got caught". The cop let him go. That guy didn't need to be educated, he knew what he had done was wrong. He needed a ticket so he would think twice before doing it again.
- Rumble strips on the streetcar ROW to prevent cars from entering.
Markham had the same problem with the BRT setup at Cedarland and Town Centre, and they solved it by painting the bus lanes red, painting "BUS ONLY" in big letters on the pavement, and using double-lines with arrows to guide drivers to the proper lane.
Even just moving all the "do not enter" signs so they aren't beside the lane you're meant to drive in would be a nice start
That seems like overkill to be honest. Markham had the same problem with the BRT setup at Cedarland and Town Centre, and they solved it by painting the bus lanes red, painting "BUS ONLY" in big letters on the pavement, and using double-lines with arrows to guide drivers to the proper lane. Even just moving all the "do not enter" signs so they aren't beside the lane you're meant to drive in would be a nice start
They should also put in railroad crossing lifts at them too or maybe just gates and have them down unless the light changes to allow people to cross the right of way.They should have something like this every intersection:
They already using a RR crossing diamond where Queens Quay crosses the tracks.
I have yet to see them drive on the ROW.They could use artificial turf on the streetcar right-of-way, so that the fire trucks can still drive on them. Especially if the works department is that afraid (very afraid) of real grass.
Put like this it does look awfully dopey. But hung over the streetcar ROW would be a lot of terrible visual clutter in a place which is meant to be a great promenade.