UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
...they should be paying us to read it. >.<
Why?...they should be paying us to read it. >.<
Yes. The idea of paying to read the news in the internet age seems absurd to me....they should be paying us to read it. >.<
To me, quality content costs money and pays for the journalists. If you want free news, you get BlogTO quality.Yes. The idea of paying to read the news in the internet age seems absurd to me.
Thank you for this! And thank you, Mr. Bozikovic. /bpws
These maps are great and it would be nice to see 2023 drawn to the same scale (wondering where the Shell Tower went in the 1963 plan). They illustrate the gradual degradation of Exhibition Place and also emphasize, to my mind, that any discussion of the future of Ontario Place should be including Exhibition Place in the "vision". They also illustrate the hypocrisy of the City politicians in their objection to the Therme plan over the grounds of privatization, architecture, loss of parkland and heritage when they have been horrible stewards of EP. Hotel X in terms of scale and architecture (and back-room deals) hardly shows that the city planners or politicians are speaking from a position of virtue.Exhibition Park Place used to be the Garrison Grounds for the "New" Fort York (of which the Stanley Barracks only remain). The federal government allowed the city of Toronto to use the garrison grounds for the Toronto Industrial Exhibition.
From link.
Over the years, the garrison grounds were taken over.
Then came the asphalt and Gardiner Expressway...
Much of the former garrison grounds have become parking. We continue to see that with Ontario Place's parking. Those parking lots have become a barrier for those who take public transit and have to crawl across the series of asphalt deserts to reach Ontario Place, previously and likely continuing.These maps are great and it would be nice to see 2023 drawn to the same scale (wondering where the Shell Tower went in the 1963 plan). They illustrate the gradual degradation of Exhibition Place and also emphasize, to my mind, that any discussion of the future of Ontario Place should be including Exhibition Place in the "vision". They also illustrate the hypocrisy of the City politicians in their objection to the Therme plan over the grounds of privatization, architecture, loss of parkland and heritage when they have been horrible stewards of EP. Hotel X in terms of scale and architecture (and back-room deals) hardly shows that the city planners or politicians are speaking from a position of virtue.
Theyve been saying that for 4 years now, though a recent document showed some kind of zoo-like tram for the trek between ontario place and exhibitionMetrolinx claims to be working on a transit solution for the last (half) mile but I suspect it will involve painting the sidewalk Tory Blue and naming it after a land developer in exchange for a donation.