Name
New Member
I have my faults; i can be terse and tend to question without prejudice.
On the surface, the only possible derogatory 'comment about' (?) highly revered Mike in TO i may have made was to include the word "shady" to describe his second hand source. And by "shady" i simply wanted to imply obscure and not so much disreputable. that's all.
Dil, stick around. The board can always use... some... brawn ... i suppose.
On the surface, the only possible derogatory 'comment about' (?) highly revered Mike in TO i may have made was to include the word "shady" to describe his second hand source. And by "shady" i simply wanted to imply obscure and not so much disreputable. that's all.
Dil, stick around. The board can always use... some... brawn ... i suppose.
Last edited: