innsertnamehere
Superstar
10-20 meters. I have a feeling this will end up between 250m and 255m.
Last edited:
I'm sorry, but your wrong. this building here is an architectual masterpiece, even with the flat roof. lets take a look at innovative architecture that is happening in toronto right now.
and you don't think this happens in other cities as well? look at one world trade centre. the spire, what at one point was supposed to be the crowning feature of the building, has now been downgraded to a measly antennae. 3 world trade centre has lost its x bracing. there is a faux historic 900 foot building proposed right beside the beekman tower. The lower manhattan skyline is dominated by plain, boring boxes from the 60's to now. London's bishopgate tower is being redesigned to be cheaper. All of chicago's recent construction other than aqua can be qualified as meh. if you want to see bland, uninspiring architecture, take a look at almost every single residential structure to be built in china in the last 50 years. I consider us lucky to be receiving such good architecture that we are getting now. the unfortunate part of life is that for every ionic skyscraper, there must be 100 non-descipt buildings to make it stand out. if we have all ionic buildings, we end up with a city skyline that just looks silly. take a look at the middle eastern city of Doha, for example:
as a reminder: beekman got the cheapening as well. One of it's sides is flat due to cost cutting measures.
but you used it as an example of an ionic building that did not get the cheapening. the Marilyn towers got the cheapening on their base. the bow lost its atrium's. Aqua doesn't have painted balconies. buildings being cheapened is a part of life and almost every structure undergoes some form of it before it is completed.