Big Daddy
Senior Member
I think you have your argument backwards. More highways = more people move to live near highways and use highways. Cities are trying to be less car dependent. That doesn't mean trucks are being discouraged, as the majority of traffic is caused by commuting by far, not delivery trucks of various size. What you should be arguing for is less highways, and more restrictions on commuting vehicles, to discourage people living far from a CBD to travel to and from it each day by road. I guarentee if we built more highways, we would have a similar situation to LA's highway system and other major US cities. A system seen as beautiful in the 50s, and seen as a major problem today.
I would like to agree with you however there is a catch. If you are proposing to ask more people to take transit - you actually have to provide the transit.
I used to take the subway but it is jammed during rush hour and I got tired of being treated like a sardine. They have been on this ridiculous “Transit” mantra for decades now (since stopping the Spadina expressway) and yet there are no new subway lines or other mass transit options available or even underway. The city is still waiting for $200,000,000 dollars in infrastructure money the Federal government promised four years ago – I don’t see it happening. It’s easy to get a bunch of tree huggers to say “tear down the Gardiner” but the reality is there is no impetus from the Federal or Provincial governments to help pay for the necessary transit improvements. If you take down the Gardiner before some major transit improvements, there will be traffic chaos ten times as bad as it is now and then jobs will begin to shift to the suburbs in even greater numbers.
Last edited: