ben.thebean1
Active Member
Existing tenants on this property were issued a 1-year lease extension contract recently.
It's definitely going to be interesting watching this progress with the NIMBY city council, and it seems to be a fairly large discussion point in the upcoming municipal election
Yea, I've seen big NIMBY fights in Burlington over mid-rises, so I can't imagine how bad it will be with this proposal.
Says who?The NIMBYism you see in Burlington is among the worst. People will fight to preserve ugly big-box plazas when attractive mixed-use developments are proposed.
Says who?
Interesting. But not necessarily accurate. The New Street bike lanes were a good idea, except no one used them. And that is the problem with many of these bike lanes in high traffic areas - lack of use. Same with transit. Blame it on the car centric residents, but that’s the way it is currently. And as the New Street bIke lanes paralleled two existing cross Burlington routes, the lack of use doomed them. Add in the fact that New Street is a major corridor for those bypassing the ever traffic choked QEW west bound and the decision was easy. Burlington and Oakville remain a recreational bikers haven but not centres of commuting by cycle. And that recreational use extends into the rural areas. The number of bikes zipping by on the weekend is accentuated by the lack of any during the week. Those riding their bikes to work or to a GO station can be measured with a 0, followed by a decimal, followed by a few more 0’s.Yup. The first example there had the developer withdraw their application, the second involved a lengthy OLT appeal to eventually get approval, and the city ultimately ripped up the New St bike lanes after testing them for a year or two.