Michael Ianni
Active Member
Satisfied with winning proposal but Landmark proposal was so much better and the original design that got cut thanks to Ford nation really could of been iconic
I'm sorry but this is depressing. Factoring in the sunk costs, the shit bridge below costs the same as the iconic design above. Delivered 5 years late, all the design value sucked out of it, same price. Sometimes I hate this city.
Now, to be fair, the current design has the advantage of allowing access to the Ordnance Triangle/future Garrison Point park between the rail corridors, whereas the original would have bypassed it. We are going to end up with a more functional design, if not a more beautiful one.
I'm sorry but this is depressing. Factoring in the sunk costs, the shit bridge below costs the same as the iconic design above. Delivered 5 years late, all the design value sucked out of it, same price. Sometimes I hate this city.
Those 2 really left a couple of irreversible big scars on the city to this day. What a waste of 4 years.Name it the "Ford Brothers' Bridges". It was their influence that we ended up with these.
Actually find both of the mentioned bridge designs rather anonymous. The one(s) chosen is the lesser of the two however, I give it props for incorporating the berm between the tracks.
I think the original design is of one bridge that bypasses the middle grassy area, whereas the new one is two bridges with access to the middle grassy area. It would seem the parameters for the design may have changed btw the two designs(?) Perhaps access to that middle grassy area was a later additional criterion(?) I like that the second design actually gives pedestrians more choices in that they can take small detours in the park.