This will come as a surprise, but I like adma's writing style. It's different. While it is difficult to read, it does force you to think, especially to catch the references. I also fully respect his position on M+G. I believe what Toronto receives in return from the demolition of the warehouses exceeds what is lost. Adma does not (if I interpet his position correctly). I kind of wish the back and forth comments die down until we hear from the panel that Vaughan has assembled. David Mirvish is also suppose to speak on the development in February. I'm optimistic that the end product may be even better than what was originally proposed. Imagine if buildup and adma ended up both prasising the final design!
Fedplanner, the internal optimist.
