News   Jul 22, 2024
 166     0 
News   Jul 22, 2024
 279     0 
News   Jul 19, 2024
 1K     0 

Toronto Facing Blackouts?

B

blixa442

Guest
Blackouts loom, city warned
Dec. 23, 2005. 04:43 AM
RICHARD BRENNAN
QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU


Toronto faces rotating blackouts within the next two years unless urgent action is taken to get new power generators and transmission lines to serve the city.That dire warning is made in a 18-month forecast on the province's power supply released yesterday.

"Without new facilities, there is a risk of rotating power cuts as early as the summer of 2008 in central Toronto during periods of high demand," said Dave Goulding, head of Ontario's Independent Electricity System Operator, which released the forecast.

While supplies of power are tight across Ontario, the city of Toronto is especially vulnerable for a numbers of reasons, including the shutdown of the Lakeview generating station in Mississauga in April. As well, proposed power projects and new transmission lines for the GTA region have been stalled because of public backlash.

For example, Ontario Power Generation and TransCanada Corp. proposed building a new gas-fired generating station in the portlands area of Toronto's eastern waterfront. But the project has faced opposition from nearby residents.

But decisions on how to address the problems, in both central Toronto and the western part of the GTA, must be made in the New Year, said Goulding. His organization manages the province's power system, balancing demand for electricity against available supply through the wholesale market, and directs the flow of electricity across the transmission system.

Toronto needs as much as 600 megawatts of new power, some of which can be delivered in stages, the organization says. But it must have 250 megawatts — or enough electricity for up to 200,000 homes — of new supply by 2008, the report said.

As it stands now, the wires bringing power into the city can't carry any more electricity.

Overall in Ontario, the organization says conditions across the province have improved slightly, with additions of new sources of power, but there is still not enough for a comfortable cushion during very cold and very hot weather.

Yesterday's forecast comes less than two weeks after the province received a 1,100-page report from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA), which outlined future energy requirements and called for nuclear power to supply half of the province's electricity needs.

That would require overhauling or replacing all Ontario nuclear reactors at a cost of up to $35 billion, said the report, which also estimated it will cost $83 billion to rebuild Ontario's electricity sector over the next 20 years.

Yesterday's forecast did note, however, that the situation in Toronto is slightly better now than last summer, when the system teetered on the edge of blackouts, because Pickering Unit 1 came back on line with 515 megawatts, and the Greater Toronto Airports Authority's new cogeneration plant started producing 117 megawatts.

Goulding said the Ontario electricity sector faces significant problems over the next decade as existing nuclear plants reach the end of their life and coal-fired plants are boarded up.

The province needs at least 25,000 megawatts of new supply over the next 15 years, especially since the Liberal government decided to close down all coal-fired power plants by 2009, representing a loss of 7,500 megawatts.

It would take two facilities the size of the Darlington nuclear station to replace the power now being generated by coal-fired plants.

Goulding called for a more efficient process to deal with the numerous power-generating projects that will require regulatory approval in order to proceed.

"The time frame to address these reliability requirements is very tight," he said.

"We need to ensure that proposed projects are properly examined from a public and regulatory point of view, but without the process becoming overly complex and preventing timely implementation."

His organization said market enhancements planned for the summer of 2006, such as buying power 24 hours in advance, will help reduce the likelihood of a repeat of last summer, when high temperatures and drought-like conditions pushed demand to record levels and decreased hydroelectric generating availability.

The IESO says it relied heavily on emergency powers in the summer to maintain reliability and avoid power interruptions.

The agency issued public appeals to consumers to cut back on electricity on 12 separate days, while 5 per cent voltage reductions, known as brownouts, were implemented across the province on two days in August. There were two additional voltage reductions in the GTA.

"This occurred despite good performance and availability of the Ontario generation and transmission facilities and the support from neighbouring markets," according to the forecast.

Toronto relies on supply generated outside the city to meet demand, but the main transmission lines and related facilities carrying this power into the city are already nearing capacity.

The planned Goreway natural gas units in Brampton will substantially reduce risks to reliability, but won't completely remove them, the IESO said.
 
this is actually something I've been thinking about recently: with our current energy crisis/situation, I wonder if and how much all these new condos and developments are going to affect this problem in this the city in a few years...
 
From CBC Toronto:

New power plant for waterfront
Last updated Jan 30 2006 08:41 AM EST
CBC News

Ontario's energy minister says she'll make final decisions within weeks about the specifications for a new power generating plant on Toronto's waterfront.

Donna Cansfield says the gas-fired plant, to be built at the site of the old Hearn generating station in the city's Portlands area, will initially produce about 300 megawatts of electricity.

Its capacity is expected to eventually rise to 600 megawatts, and the new facility may produce heat as well as electricity, she said.

Without such a plant, Cansfield says the city could be hit by rolling blackouts by 2008.

Toronto's Board of Trade is applauding the move, which it says will help stave off a "crisis" in the city's energy supply.

"We've delayed for so long, we now have to take some action," said Board of Trade spokesperson Rob McLeese. "We don't have any choices."

But while Mayor David Miller acknowledges that they city faces a power crunch, he says a 600-megawatt plant is too big for the area.

"Toronto has to have proper power, but we have to first look at conservation," Miller said.

Cansfield is also in favour of encouraging conservation, but said changing the energy consumption habits of consumers will take time that the province may not have.
_________________________________________________

I have absolutely no problem with a power plant in the area, provided it 1. meets stringent environmental standards; 2. will be used as the district energy plant and 3. with a site plan that allow for maximium flexiblity with regards to planning in the rest of the Portlands.

AoD
 
My office is near Queen and Sherbourne. We've had three blackouts ranging from 2-6 hours during the last eight months or so. Totally unacceptable.
 
Like it not, Toronto to get gas plant: McGuinty
Jan. 30, 2006. 04:52 PM
CANADIAN PRESS

Ontario's premier says Torontonians will have to accept the fact that a gas-fired plant will be built in the city.

Premier Dalton McGuinty said today he understands why there's local opposition to the possible construction of a natural-gas plant in Toronto's east end.

But Toronto currently has no power generation capability of its own and relies on existing transmission lines to draw power from outside the city.

And experts warn that without a new plant, Toronto could face rolling blackouts in 2008.

McGuinty says that faced with that gloomy prediction, there's no choice but to build a new gas plant in the city.

Provincial sources say an impasse with city hall has delayed plans to get a project going.
 
Now I see where the impasse at City Hall comes from..

PORT LANDS GREEN ENERGY PLAN RELEASED - January 05, 2006

At a press conference on January 5, 2006, Deputy Mayor Sandra Bussin, Paula Fletcher, City Councillor for the Port Lands and Marilyn Churley, former MPP for Toronto-Danforth, released their 10 point green energy plan. It adds up to more than 750 mega watts of power produced or saved through new energy production and energy efficiency measures. The plan, developed by an expert panel commissioned by the local politicians, as well as MP Jack Layton, outlines a visionary and realistic alternative to the province’s plan to put an oversized 650 mega watt power plant in the Port Lands.

See the press release, a summary of the 10-point Port Lands Green Energy Plan and the full report below.

Working for You!

Paula Fletcher

City Councillor
Toronto-Danforth, Ward 30
_____________________________

January 5, 2006
For Immediate Release

Expert Panel Report on Port Lands Green Energy Plan: More than 750 Mega Watts of Power a Win-Win-Win for Energy, Environment, Jobs

Deputy Mayor Sandra Bussin, Paula Fletcher, City Councillor for the Port Lands and Marilyn Churley, former MPP for Toronto-Danforth, today released their 10 point green energy plan. It adds up to more than 750 mega watts of power produced or saved through new energy production and energy efficiency measures. The plan, developed by an expert panel commissioned by the local politicians, as well as MP Jack Layton, outlines a visionary and realistic alternative to the province’s plan to put an oversized 650 mega watt power plant in the Port Lands.

“As Deputy Mayor I am committed to keeping the lights on in Toronto and cleaning up the air at the same time. Our approach will do that and I call on the Province to follow our lead in planning for power for Toronto,†Sandra Bussin said in releasing the discussion paper.

“Our Green Energy Plan is a win-win-win for energy, the environment and jobs. The future of the Port Lands is green, not grey,†said Councillor Paula Fletcher, whose ward includes the Port Lands. “Our expert panel report shows that it’s not necessary to have such a large plant on our waterfront to meet Toronto’s energy needs.â€

“It’s just too big. Green power, energy efficiency, a new way of powering our society — that’s the alternative to mega-plant thinking that the province is trapped in,†said Marilyn Churley, who helped commission the study when she was still the MPP. “If this proposal is to be redirected, we must provide realistic green alternatives and our panel’s report does just that.â€

The 750 mega watt, 10 point plan was developed by the expert panel which was chaired by Peter Tabuns, former Executive Director of Greenpeace, and included Keith Stewart of the Toronto Environmental Alliance, and Brent Kopperson and Melinda Zytaruk of the Ontario Sustainable Energy Association. The panel’s plan calls for substantial investment in energy efficiency, expansion of Deep Lake Water Cooling, wind power and energy generation in the major office buildings in downtown Toronto, all of which adds up to more than 750 mega watts of much needed power.

The expert panel’s report will go out to interested community members for feedback. Several community leaders have already signed on, including Paul Young, Philip Knox and Terry Lee all leaders in the community’s opposition to a mega power plant in the Port Lands.

The province’s decision on whether to build an oversized 650 mega watt in the Port Lands is expected to be made within the next month.

www.paulafletcher.ca/main...full&id=97
 
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the concept and intent of Fletcher's plan, of course - which would be a fine thing to try out AFTER one builds the power plant.

Honestly, I wonder if they've ever looked at what's the collective amount of pollution generated by say, 100k homes with gas-fired boilers?

AoD
 
Concerning energy policy, here is one thing for which all Ontario political parties deserve a big kick in the ass.
 
From the Star:

Power plant is coming, premier tells T.O.
Jan. 31, 2006. 01:00 AM
RICHARD BRENNAN
STAFF REPORTERS


Premier Dalton McGuinty says Toronto is getting a new gas-fired power plant whether the city likes it or not because otherwise it risks serious electricity shortages.

"We need to build new generation inside the city of Toronto. We can't duck this. ... It's either that or we talk about rolling blackouts," McGuinty told reporters at Queen's Park yesterday.

"In an ideal world, we could get to where we need to go through conservation and renewables like wind. But we don't live in that world. We live in this one."

That was an apparent reference to Mayor David Miller's comment that the city should first try to conserve energy before going ahead with a controversial gas-fired power plant in the port lands at a cost of more than $500 million.

Just last month, Ontario's Independent Electricity System Operator issued a report saying Toronto faces rotating blackouts within two years unless urgent action is taken to get new power generators and transmission lines to serve the city.

"We have a growing economy and a growing population and I hope that all of us who have the privilege of serving (in) the position of responsibility understand that it's something that we have to do — we are going to have to build more generation inside the city of Toronto," McGuinty said.

Ontario Power Generation and TransCanada Corp. have proposed building a 550-megawatt, gas-fired generating station on Toronto's eastern waterfront near the site of the mothballed Hearn generating station. But the project has faced opposition from nearby residents.

The Liberal government will have to instruct the Ontario Power Authority to make the new generating station happen.

A spokesperson said Energy Minister Donna Cansfield would be issuing a directive to the authority within the next few weeks outlining various options on how to get more power to downtown.

Toronto Councillor Paula Fletcher (Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth) vowed to battle any big generation development in the port lands. "If you want to fight, let's get into it," Fletcher said in an interview.
_________________________________________________

bizorky:

Actually, the end users (hogs) also deserve a kick in the rear.

AoD
 
Is there some monetary incentive or assistance (other than wanting a cleaner enviroment) to help homeowners offset the cost of making homes more energy effecient. We did some upgrades at home adding more insulation, plugging leaks and using more effecient lightbulbs. I would replace my medium effeciency gas furnace with a cleaner high effeciency unit but the cost is prohibitive at this time.
 
There's a lot of easily identifiable waste: such as stores that for some reason feel the need to keep their signs lit all through the night.
 
^On neighbourhood streets I think those lights provide a needed public service, but in terms of big box and warehouse stores I agree.

We need to conserve, build new renewable energy sources AND build conventional energy sources as well. If conservation and renewables can in the future curtail the need for the portland plant then so be it. Until then anyone who has even a passing understanding on the energy file in Ontario knows that we are in heaps of doo all round.
 
The province has plans to install smart meters in all homes and businesses. That way you can see how much you are spending at any given time and adjust your usage accordingly. Tests have shown good savings. This will be implemented over the next five years I believe.

Conservation is important but a growing population still means additional capacity is needed.
 
Neighbourhood streets usually have streetlights though, so lighted up store signs are redundant.
 
There are so many easy things that can be done to reduce engery use, yet we do nothing. We're living in the dark ages, which will soon take on new meaning. Why not ban the sale of incandescent light bulbs, and private electric and gas powered lawnmowers? Subsidize the cost of low power LCD monitors and new appliances. Enact by-laws forcing shop owners to close their front doors in the summer time. Policies like these allow energy to be reduced without requiring us to change our wasteful lifestyle. And if people actually did start to actively conserve power, the peak demand could be reduced further.
 

Back
Top