Toronto eCondos | 195.67m | 58s | Bazis | Rosario Varacalli

Look how close that crane is to 2200 Yonge. That's got to be about 12"!
econdo-crane.jpg
 

Attachments

  • econdo-crane.jpg
    econdo-crane.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 2,443
Sept 5
It looks like they will need 3 cranes at first and then 2 for the towers.
21343318231_9594e2e273_b.jpg

21147221668_3b46196a3a_b.jpg

20714026363_20bbca8ffe_b.jpg

21100121920_953aed5f6b_b.jpg

21277648412_49119bb27c_b.jpg

21288221235_d6f583f305_b.jpg

21100343088_9e2b049a3d_b.jpg

21288242715_b689dae2af_b.jpg
 
A shot similar to BjamesT's -- I don't understand how crane booms are allowed to go this close to an existing structure:

IMG_0826.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0826.JPG
    IMG_0826.JPG
    592.2 KB · Views: 1,834
It would be interesting to know what amount of insurance is involved when cranes over-swing neighbouring properties, along with any agreements that have to be made with neighbouring property owners.

42
 
I do know from direct experience that a crane swing easement can be negotiated with the neighbours in question in order to permit that encroachment. As the encroachee rather than the encroacher, so to speak, I do not know what if any insurance is taken out. IIRC, the easement did include a clause about making good any damage. As I recall, there was a similar statement with respect to some of the horizontal drilling which takes place during the shoring process in excavation. This was all a few years ago, however, and my memory may be faulty as to details.
 
We too had a strong incentive to make things work. IIRC, the easement was described to me by our counsel, not theirs, as boiler plate language. I think the agreements may be common. But that crane is certainly uncommonly close!
 
Oct 22:

Some upward construction on the south tower's below grade levels
IMG_9032.JPG

IMG_9035.JPG


These next few are shot through grime covered windows. Just thought I would share my lack of pride for this next batch
IMG_9034.JPG
IMG_9037.JPG
IMG_9039.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9032.JPG
    IMG_9032.JPG
    337.8 KB · Views: 1,309
  • IMG_9034.JPG
    IMG_9034.JPG
    271.9 KB · Views: 1,291
  • IMG_9035.JPG
    IMG_9035.JPG
    322.4 KB · Views: 1,288
  • IMG_9037.JPG
    IMG_9037.JPG
    376.3 KB · Views: 1,265
  • IMG_9039.JPG
    IMG_9039.JPG
    269.7 KB · Views: 1,253
Can someone remind me why they weren't able to assemble the entire Yonge frontage on this block? Or was that never considered a part of this project.
Don't get me wrong, the restaurants and shops there are better than a TD bank ever will be, but that remaining block of low rise retail seems very odd all things considered.
 
In some ways I agree, but it does prevent the site from become completely "sterile" . Most developers don't know how to deal with large sites so they make one long continuous glass facade. This will ultimately look better - more human.
 

Back
Top