Anth
Active Member
To be honest, I hadn't noticed this thread was specifically for Eglinton.
As for the original Transit City plan:
- I would've killed the RT revitalization (let's not forget *that* was in the plan), Sheppard East, Jane, and Malvern. Don Mills questionable.
- I would've kept Eglinton (with reservations about the street-level parts), Finch, and Waterfront.
- I would've added DRL and BD extension to SCC
- I would've done nothing on Sheppard for the time being
As for today, I guess the current incarnation of the Crosstown will be more reliable than the previous one and solves the RT issue, but a DRL would still be far more useful. And I'd still leave Sheppard alone for now if the money isn't there to extend it. It seems pretty successful to me considering only half of it was built, but it also should in no way be the focus of our transit plans.
Edit: What gweed said as well
As for the original Transit City plan:
- I would've killed the RT revitalization (let's not forget *that* was in the plan), Sheppard East, Jane, and Malvern. Don Mills questionable.
- I would've kept Eglinton (with reservations about the street-level parts), Finch, and Waterfront.
- I would've added DRL and BD extension to SCC
- I would've done nothing on Sheppard for the time being
As for today, I guess the current incarnation of the Crosstown will be more reliable than the previous one and solves the RT issue, but a DRL would still be far more useful. And I'd still leave Sheppard alone for now if the money isn't there to extend it. It seems pretty successful to me considering only half of it was built, but it also should in no way be the focus of our transit plans.
Edit: What gweed said as well