News   Dec 20, 2024
 3.5K     11 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.3K     3 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 2K     0 

Toronto Crosstown LRT | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis

Are some cross trained on line 5 and 6? But surely there isn't demand for them now so would they be spare board operators?
As has been mentioned before....

Both lines will be operated from one division, just as how the BD and SRT was configured, or how the YUS and Sheppard still is today. Not necessarily all operators will be trained on both lines, but at least at the startup there will be some operators who will be capable of that.

Dan
 
Screenshot_2024-12-10_105156.jpg
 
So <2 weeks ago Verster said RSD (revenue service demonstration) will be early in Q1. This lines up with @Northern Light 's source and is a similar timeline to what I've heard from people associated with CrosstownLRT.

Recall that passengers are the only difference between RSD and the line being open to the public. Lets say Verster conservatively implied a mid February timeline with his comments. But according to the TTC we are expected to believe that they will be unable to operate the line for another 6 months after RSD? Give me a break.
 
So <2 weeks ago Verster said RSD (revenue service demonstration) will be early in Q1. This lines up with @Northern Light 's source and is a similar timeline to what I've heard from people associated with CrosstownLRT.

Recall that passengers are the only difference between RSD and the line being open to the public. Lets say Verster conservatively implied a mid February timeline with his comments. But according to the TTC we are expected to believe that they will be unable to operate the line for another 6 months after RSD? Give me a break.
At this point I think they're padding their schedule "just 'cause."

Or maybe they've gotten so used to huge delays that that don't actually remember how to do an opening day anymore.
 
So <2 weeks ago Verster said RSD (revenue service demonstration) will be early in Q1. This lines up with @Northern Light 's source and is a similar timeline to what I've heard from people associated with CrosstownLRT.

Recall that passengers are the only difference between RSD and the line being open to the public. Lets say Verster conservatively implied a mid February timeline with his comments. But according to the TTC we are expected to believe that they will be unable to operate the line for another 6 months after RSD? Give me a break.

If my source's info is accurate; and I don't doubt them at all; but they are as at the mercy as the rest of us to Mx, or the consortium not achieving what they were supposed to by date 'x'.......The TTC would have sufficient lead time to begin to operate sometime in Q2.

As @Steve Munro has pointed out above, there is a lead time from the moment the TTC is told 'GO' to being able to have the line staffed up, the minimum lead time is one Board Period, (sign-up for routes by operators), which varies in length throughout the year, but would be ~6-8 weeks on average, but the lead time is actually a bit longer, as someone has to order the new schedule into effect and create the sign-up ups for those schedules, which won't be changed the day or even the week before they are supposed to go up.

To bring this back together, I think a Q2 date from mid-April through end of June should be viable if other targets are hit as they should be.

But the latter remains to be seen.

Ramping up service in the summer would seem odd to me; as the TTC has to deal with vacations like any employer, and generally cuts back service going into summer. But we shall see.
 
If my source's info is accurate; and I don't doubt them at all; but they are as at the mercy as the rest of us to Mx, or the consortium not achieving what they were supposed to by date 'x'.......The TTC would have sufficient lead time to begin to operate sometime in Q2.

As @Steve Munro has pointed out above, there is a lead time from the moment the TTC is told 'GO' to being able to have the line staffed up, the minimum lead time is one Board Period, (sign-up for routes by operators), which varies in length throughout the year, but would be ~6-8 weeks on average, but the lead time is actually a bit longer, as someone has to order the new schedule into effect and create the sign-up ups for those schedules, which won't be changed the day or even the week before they are supposed to go up.

To bring this back together, I think a Q2 date from mid-April through end of June should be viable if other targets are hit as they should be.

But the latter remains to be seen.

Ramping up service in the summer would seem odd to me; as the TTC has to deal with vacations like any employer, and generally cuts back service going into summer. But we shall see.
Summer gives the TTC the time to measure the service impacts of the massive number of service changes that will be made once it launches with a bit of a lower demand for service. Doing so would allow them to make adjustments to the schedules that would go into effect for the September board period when service demand increases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1
Summer gives the TTC the time to measure the service impacts of the massive number of service changes that will be made once it launches with a bit of a lower demand for service. Doing so would allow them to make adjustments to the schedules that would go into effect for the September board period when service demand increases.
Except that the schedule sign ups for the September board period occur some time in advance, so if there is any time frame in which they can make adjustments to the schedule, it is a trivially small one.
 
Summer gives the TTC the time to measure the service impacts of the massive number of service changes that will be made once it launches with a bit of a lower demand for service. Doing so would allow them to make adjustments to the schedules that would go into effect for the September board period when service demand increases.

@T3G is correct. The September Board is set by mid-July at the latest. So they would be unable to use any learnings before the October Board.
 
I know in the past, the TTC has had an aversion to having major service adjustments take place in the summer board periods (asides from the seasonal service reductions).

Unless Metrolinx presses them to do otherwise, i'd be surprised if the TTC would willingly look to start operations here in the summer board periods.
 
I know in the past, the TTC has had an aversion to having major service adjustments take place in the summer board periods (asides from the seasonal service reductions).

Unless Metrolinx presses them to do otherwise, i'd be surprised if the TTC would willingly look to start operations here in the summer board periods.
Is it only a matter of time that Metrolinx merges with (takes over) the TTC?
 
Is it only a matter of time that Metrolinx merges with (takes over) the TTC?

I would speculate that is now off the table. ML has no credibility left. QP does not want to inherit the operational headache of delivering transit to Toronto, especially with an unreliable organization doing the delivery..... and the organizational churn would paralyse things for a year or two..

It was fine for ML to propose "Superlinx" a few years ago, but fortunes have changed.

- Paul
 

Back
Top