Members shouldn't be deterred from expressing their own opinions toward all matters, let it be considered stupid or tasteless. This is a public forum, not an expert panel.
Except that the same "freedom of speech" that allows for such possibly ignorant judgment can also allow for the
judgment of said judgment, no? Otherwise, such opinions would disappear in an unchecked "have your say" haze. I mean, it may not be literally a show-your-credential-badge "expert panel"; but experts of one sort or another linger here, like it or not. And if they happen to "define" a lot of the discourse...well, the cream will rise. Otherwise, you'd get the blathering trollfests that are newspaper comments pages, realms where "experts" bailed long ago.
And now, to another poster...
==================
It is a generic 60's/70's modernist midrise box
You know, for you to get the date so blatantly wrong, I wouldn't trust you on
any judgment of postwar modernism, any more than I'd trust a Teabagger with spelling. I don't have to address anything else in your post. Just that date. Sorry.
---------
Though one thing that's come to mind via this discussion: maybe in terms of Toronto, there's a potential new definition of the term "to Google", i.e. to retain and sympathetically restore a midcentury modern building (i.e. "it'd be real neat if Scientology opted to Google its HQ rather than recladding it")