gristle
Senior Member
And only seven? Is that really much of a victory?
Is that not better than nothing?
And only seven? Is that really much of a victory?
I agree, history shows us that living where you work almost always ends up in redrum.I like the idea of having affordable housing in the same building as a hotel and condos, but having the affordable housing geared to people who work in the building strikes me as a bad idea, and probably unworkable. Taken seriously, it could lead to dt's observation that losing your job also means losing your place of residence (can you say 'court challenge'?). It would certainly place the person living there at risk of being abused by their employer ("Sorry, Michael, I've had to cancel your day off. You could quit of course, but it would also mean losing your apartment"). But also, it's not clear that the people who work in the hotel would necessarily have the most need of assisted housing - would they jump to the head of the line just because they were a concierge?
I wouldn't worry, though, because I think the concept is so unworkable that in reality, the assisted housing and the jobs in the hotel will end up in different hands anyways over time.
A pox on condo-site musak!
I'd really like to know the name of that track!