Christopher Brown
Active Member
Aside from the flowerbeds closer to the flatiron and the pedestrianization of Scott, I think this was a negative move. I loved the old curvilinear brick retaining walls, varying topography, and canopy provided by the old trees.
They basically leveled the whole thing, stripped out half of the mature trees, carved up the patterning into 1990s parallelograms, and installed some interesting tiling and a kitschy fountain. The result (at least and maybe especially now, in the winter) looks far less luxuriant and comfortable, and is completely devoid of the oasitic quality that made the old design so magnetic. I'll wait til the summer to issue a final damnation and I might be totally missing something but this looks like landscaping that went unused for a suburban community centre.
And yeah, I'm not insistent on traditional aesthetics necessarily but that fountain is a hideous piece of art.
My views and my recollections are completely opposite yours. I thought the old layout was worn out, not cared for, uninteresting and a magnet for undesirable elements.
Today and even more so tomorrow as word of the changes spread I expect this park to be a huge attraction for tourists, neighbors and families. It's a home-run for downtown. However, if nostalgia continues to tug at your heart wander over to David Crombie Park. It has all the brick and mud and concrete charms you're pining for.