Red October
Senior Member
Clewes is attached to this because it is an utterly boring glass box with no creativity or thought put into it. His speciality.
Clewes is attached to this because it is an utterly boring glass box with no creativity or thought put into it. His speciality.
Irishmonk:
I tend to agree that we as a city should demand good design, but before we do, I think we should ask - what does the building we currently own/live in looks like. Besides, knowing the city's lack of power in this area, shouldn't the howls be directed at Brookfield and their tenants instead?
AoD
Irishmonk:
But of course, if you ask the average Joe out there, they'd probably say it is a fine building.
AoD
The Architect:
To be fair though, of all the aA/Clewes projects we have seen in the city so far - are any of them similar to one another to such an extent that is any more so than condo/apartment projects by other architects?
AoD
Any chance of them adding floors is demand warrants it?
One interesting thing is that BA I is still not fully occupied. There are two floors I can see from my window in the Canada Permanent somewhere in the single digits that still have no tenants.
Nope, everybody in this city likes to copy and paste. The only reason I chose Clewes there was because of the shape/lack of design features.