The Star articles often end up sounding uninformed to me, because they're full of questionable statements.
Beyond the typo in the title ("Toronto condos towers"?), they say
Aura will tower 272 metres and — for a while at least — surpass everything in the city except the CN Tower and First Canadian Place.
That is simply not true by any measure.
Toronto's tallest by total height would be:
1. CN Tower: 553m
2. FCP: 355m
3. Commerce Court West: 287m
4. Trump Tower: 277m
5. Scotia Plaza: 274m
6. Aura: 272m
Toronto's tallest by structural height (including spires but not antennas) would be:
1. CN Tower: 553m
2. FCP: 298m
3. Trump Tower: 277m
4. Scotia Plaza: 274m
5. Aura: 272m
And they clearly aren't talking about building height alone, because in that case the CN Tower would not count at all, and even if they did count it, Aura would still only be 4th.
They also make a big deal about Aura being Canada's tallest condo, but they never mention that it's also North America's tallest as well.
Then there's that section about supertalls and megatalls in asia which really has little to do with the article.