News   Nov 04, 2024
 500     0 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 744     5 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 929     1 

Toronto Architecture from the 1940's and 1950's

now ur just pickin' nits.....
not sure why there is such a hate on for this guy in this forum....
 
Don't tell Rob Ford, but most of the original (1954) 'subway' in the burbs (Bloor to Eglinton) was not underground.

Anna: That is true-the TTC sold the air rights over much of the open cut original Yonge Subway route...

Another interesting TTC Subway fact comes to mind looking again at these pictures: The TTC Subway car fleet did not have headlights
and train operators relied on the tunnel lighting and overhead lights outdoors - note the light poles between the tracks...

Sometime during the 80s a tragic tunnel accident in which one or more track workers was killed or severely injured the TTC then ordered
that all cars in use would have headlights installed - they were very low almost at track level - and any new cars would be equipped with
headlights...What happens in tunnels over time is that the fine brake dust can circulate in tunnels and can cause light fixtures to not be
at their brightest - flourescent tube covers need to be cleaned from time to time or the covers removed with the tube in a protective
glass or plastic outer tube that fits over the bulb to further protect it - NYC Transit uses these extensively in their system especially in
stations...LI MIKE
 
Last edited:
Never noticed that, about the headlights, Mike. Thanks!

Another elegant station, which I suspect was by Parkin (though I can find no verification of the fact) was the Wellesley Subway Station, which has a number of the elements of the Adelaide Terminal, which started this thread, and the TTC shelter he designed on Davenport. Much debased, and enveloped by the current building above and around, the station is still there (but one has to search to find its former elegance).

wellesleyrendering.jpg


1952:

wellesley1952.jpg


wellesley1952a.jpg


wellesley1952b.jpg


wellesley1952c.jpg


wellesley1952d.jpg


1953:

wellesley1953.jpg


wellesley1953a.jpg


1954:

wellesley1954.jpg


1955:

wellesley1955.jpg


Today:

wellesleytoday.jpg
 

Attachments

  • wellesleyrendering.jpg
    wellesleyrendering.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 1,285
  • wellesley1952.jpg
    wellesley1952.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 1,317
  • wellesley1952a.jpg
    wellesley1952a.jpg
    96.4 KB · Views: 1,317
  • wellesley1952b.jpg
    wellesley1952b.jpg
    97.3 KB · Views: 1,372
  • wellesley1952c.jpg
    wellesley1952c.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 1,277
  • wellesley1952d.jpg
    wellesley1952d.jpg
    96.3 KB · Views: 1,314
  • wellesley1953.jpg
    wellesley1953.jpg
    94.7 KB · Views: 1,251
  • wellesley1953a.jpg
    wellesley1953a.jpg
    93.1 KB · Views: 1,285
  • wellesley1954.jpg
    wellesley1954.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 1,269
  • wellesley1955.jpg
    wellesley1955.jpg
    85.5 KB · Views: 1,303
  • wellesleytoday.jpg
    wellesleytoday.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 1,970
What's truly shocking is how tree-lined and residentially leafy Wellesley was 60 years ago...
 
What's truly shocking is how tree-lined and residentially leafy Wellesley was 60 years ago...

True, and only 7 years before those pics (1947), Jarvis Street was widened and lost its trees:

s0372_ss0058_it1725-2.jpg


s0372_ss0058_it1752-2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • s0372_ss0058_it1725-2.jpg
    s0372_ss0058_it1725-2.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 1,204
  • s0372_ss0058_it1752-2.jpg
    s0372_ss0058_it1752-2.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 1,181
Those 1950s road widening projects transformed the city, turning small residential streets into arterials. Unfortunately, with the exception of University Avenue, there was no ambition to them besides increasing road capacity. There don't appear to have been any public realm improvements like new street trees, ornamental street lights or landscaping. They didn't even bury the overhead wires.
 
Those 1950s road widening projects transformed the city, turning small residential streets into arterials. Unfortunately, with the exception of University Avenue, there was no ambition to them besides increasing road capacity. There don't appear to have been any public realm improvements like new street trees, ornamental street lights or landscaping. They didn't even bury the overhead wires.

Very little has changed, junctionist. There is still very little coordination between Works, Urban Design, Urban Foresty and the utility companies. For years City has mused over the idea of a "Department of the Public Realm", which could coordinate all these departments. As we can clearly see (look at the University Avenue fountains), this is not a priority and clearly beyond the City's ability (notwithstanding Chief Planner Jennifer Keesmat's tweets to the contrary).
 
Original Yonge subway stations

Notice how the original stations didn't even have the station name at the entrance. Those were only added in the '80s renovations. With the great job they did at Union as proof that renovations can be well done, it would be great to see some of these stations redone in a very close facsimile of their original appearance. The brown tiles have had their day.
 

Back
Top