longfortheoldview
New Member
There's a big Mirvish announcement tomorrow that some think is an announcement of a new theatre. Does this development or the resubmission have a new theatre space that is replacing the CAA Theatre?
Toronto 645 Yonge | 280m | 76s | KingSett Capital | AS + GG
- Thread starter DonValleyRainbow
- Start date
Lenser
Senior Member
I find this design to be very awkward in its weird massing. Not feeling it at all.
Amare
Senior Member
Not to worry, there's a 95% chance KingSett wont be building this anyways so it's all fantasy land renderings until they flip to someone who will actually build onsite here.
Lenser
Senior Member
In which case, I would be relieved.
goodcitywhenfinished
Active Member
You won’t be relieved when it’s sold to concord and some atrocious richmond/wallman/dialog design is built on the site.
UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
This is one person's opinion though. The building would be a massive upgrade to a lot of things, perhaps even a game changer if ever was built, IMO...
...that said, and as mentioned, this probably won't get built. Unless KingSett decide to evolve from a zoning exercise outfit with pretty pictures to a real developer. Other than that, considered ourselves trolled.
...that said, and as mentioned, this probably won't get built. Unless KingSett decide to evolve from a zoning exercise outfit with pretty pictures to a real developer. Other than that, considered ourselves trolled.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Lenser
Senior Member
Game changer? More like lame changer; it's a hot mess. Nor does your opinion cancel out mine.
UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
Nor was my opinion intended cancel out yours. Just noting the different points of view here. /shrug
Strange Advance
Active Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 635
- Reaction score
- 648
- Location
- Home of the Brave, Worlds Away
It's a gangly design, with the two bifurcated wedges, one sharp, the other rounded. It looks like an awkward collision of two different buildings, but I don't hate it. It would be something different.
Lenser
Senior Member
It does indeed look awkward. Like a half-formed notion from a drunken evening where you scribbled your vision down on the back of a napkin.
maestro
Senior Member
Kingsett aside.
I don't see anything saleable in the tower on top of the tower in the plans on the previous page. It would be the first thing cut or replaced through a minor variance for more floors.
I don't see anything saleable in the tower on top of the tower in the plans on the previous page. It would be the first thing cut or replaced through a minor variance for more floors.
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Indoor amenity. It doesn't need to go up there, per se, but unless they're going to seek a variance for it (the City wouldn't look fondly on that), it needs to be provided on site (2sm indoor, 2sm outdoor).
3Dementia
Senior Member
From your PDF link... now described as down to 70 storeys with a completely different elevation:
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-243378.pdf
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-243378.pdf
Northern Light
Superstar
Wrong thread, my bad.