Toronto 630 Finch Avenue East | 47.1m | 11s | Bazis | Rosario Varacalli

bilked said:
So Michael Lancefield's lot borders a surface parking lot and backs onto a major arterial road in the fastest growing major City in North America... and yet he's shocked to learn the property next door will be developed.

..mmkay.
Click to expand...

Exactly, should a few hundred people be denied access to this neighbourhood because it would make this one old guy uncomfortable?

Unfortunately, most of my neighbours in Markham would probably agree with this guy and will have a similar reaction when our own local plazas get torn down for midrises.
 
canarob said:
Exactly, should a few hundred people be denied access to this neighbourhood because it would make this one old guy uncomfortable?

Unfortunately, most of my neighbours in Markham would probably agree with this guy and will have a similar reaction when our own local plazas get torn down for midrises.
Click to expand...
there are A LOT of lawn signs all over the area about how Tridel's proposal is not appropriate. I feel like we're the only non-NIMBYs in this neighbourhood lol. Can't build modular housing on cummer, can't intensify along finch, can't build on St. Joseph's property. BANANA!
 
A report came before the meeting of City Council on March 9th, 2022, recommending acceptance of a settlement offer in respect of this application.

That report was adopted.

Link here: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-222451.pdf

From said report:

1647505431137.png


1647505453119.png


1647505474670.png


Links to the revise Architectural Plans and other docs can be found here: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2022.CC41.13

1647505622182.png


1647505699818.png


1647505738775.png

1647505762325.png


1647505833149.png
 
noreallyitsme said:
I think Councilor Carrol mentioned this one is also been brought to the OLT?
Click to expand...

The above is a settlement offer, accepted by the City in advance of an OLT hearing.

In the normal course of business that settlement will be accepted by the OLT and what you see above is what will be permitted.

I do say 'normal course of business' because while rare, these things do sometimes go off-script.
 
Northern Light said:
The above is a settlement offer, accepted by the City in advance of an OLT hearing.

In the normal course of business that settlement will be accepted by the OLT and what you see above is what will be permitted.

I do say 'normal course of business' because while rare, these things do sometimes go off-script.
Click to expand...
Oh that’s great news thanks so much!
 
Northern Light said:
The above is a settlement offer, accepted by the City in advance of an OLT hearing.

In the normal course of business that settlement will be accepted by the OLT and what you see above is what will be permitted.

I do say 'normal course of business' because while rare, these things do sometimes go off-script.
Click to expand...

noreallyitsme said:
Oh that’s great news thanks so much!
Click to expand...
Essentially, when the City and developer settle in advance of an OLT hearing, the OLT simply ratifies, rubber stamps it, as they do still have final say once an application has been appealed to them. They'll typically set out in an order whatever conditions the City has set upon final approval, usually being where Section 37 (public benefit) moneys will be spent, etc., but whatever's in the settlement goes through.

42
 
interchange42 said:
Essentially, when the City and developer settle in advance of an OLT hearing, the OLT simply ratifies, rubber stamps it, as they do still have final say once an application has been appealed to them. They'll typically set out in an order whatever conditions the City has set upon final approval, usually being where Section 37 (public benefit) moneys will be spent, etc., but whatever's in the settlement goes through.

42
Click to expand...
Thanks so much for that info. So glad to see this moving forward despite all the NIMBY nonsense opposing it.
 
New renderings are updated in the database. The information that is updated is the total unit count changed from 206 units to 238 units. Overall storey count changed from 12 storeys to 11 storeys. Total height changed from 48.75m to 47.10m.

Renderings are taken from the architectural plan via Site Plan Approval.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top