afransen
Senior Member
So there are proposals for SW and NE corners of Hurontario and Eglinton. What about the plaza on SE corner?
I don't disagree. Not sure I would call this MCC, though it is nearby. The highway is a pretty formidable barrier.MCC will always be a no-go zone for pedestrians. Get over it. Put the parkette in the middle, between the buildings where people might actually use it. Plug the highway corner with a concrete wall. Paint it with pretty colours for the hundreds of cars per minute going by and keep the kids on the swings safe from 15 lanes of traffic.
At one point, the City was thinking of putting in a dedicated pedestrian bridge across the 403. The bridge should have been included as part of the LRT project. As it stands now, it's not a pleasant experience walking across the Hurontario/403 bridge, it's too dangerous.I don't disagree. Not sure I would call this MCC, though it is nearby. The highway is a pretty formidable barrier.
Being appealed
Moved By Councillor J. Kovac 1. That City Council direct Legal Services, representatives from the appropriate City Departments and any necessary consultants to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing on the subject applications under File OZ 21/002 W4, 30 Eglinton Avenue West Limited (c/o Crown Property), 30 Eglinton Avenue West to permit three apartments with heights of 34, 32 and 28 storeys and ground floor commercial uses, in support of the recommendations outlined in the report dated February 10, 2023 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building, that concludes that the proposed official plan amendment and rezoning are not acceptable in their current form and should not be approved.
2. That City Council provide the Planning and Building Department with the authority to instruct Legal Services on modifications to the position deemed necessary during or before the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing process, however if there is a potential for settlement, then a report shall be brought back to Council by Legal Services.
3. That six oral submissions be received.
YES (8): Councillor S. Dasko, Councillor A. Tedjo, Councillor C. Fonseca, Councillor J. Kovac, Councillor C. Parrish, Councillor M. Mahoney, Councillor M. Reid, and Councillor B. Butt ABSENT (4): Mayor Crombie, Councillor J. Horneck, Councillor D. Damerla, and Councillor S. McFadden
1. That City Council direct Legal Services usually mean it being appealedThere is no mention for the refusal reason. It can’t be height or density since there are numerous high rises in the area.