Toronto 1631 Queen East | 64.7m | 18s | CreateTO | SvN

Ahhh, I had missed that detail

Easy to do.

-- which document contains that updated Daycare capacity information..? Thx!

It isn't there.

****

You'd have to go back to page 2 of this thread:

 
COMMUNITY MEETING

In-Person
Wednesday, October 22, 2025
6:30 pm – 8:30 pm

OPEN HOUSE format – stop by anytime to talk with members of the project team

Location
Beaches United Church – 140 Wineva Avenue

LINK - https://createto.ca/projects/1631-queen-street-east

1760067209516.png
 
I will miss the Harvey's somewhat with it being the closest to me! However I'm glad Harvey's property was purchased rather than being expropriated. Having the corner property will be so much better for this site. Perhaps Harvey's will find a new location nearby?
 
Why on earth are they keeping the lane open to thru vehicle traffic between Queen and Eastern...?
 
Article covering the public meeting.

“You have the Urban Design Guidelines, and that’s size. But there’s also issues around the quality of these buildings, especially if you’re on a main street like Queen, which has a certain character and has a pedestrian kind of experience with its small stores and not something that’s the same all the way along,” said Chadwick.

Again and again, NIMBYs focus on height when they should be agitating for better ground level design. Up to a certain point, height is never as much of an issue as people imagine it's going to be and concerns about precedent are overblown because this site and the Summerville site are unusually large and at a main intersection. There aren't really any spaces in the Beach itself that are able to accommodate something of this scale. And because the Beachers want their area preserved in amber, locations like this need to do some heavier lifting.
 
I wonder if our old friend BG was there
 
Article covering the public meeting.

“You have the Urban Design Guidelines, and that’s size. But there’s also issues around the quality of these buildings, especially if you’re on a main street like Queen, which has a certain character and has a pedestrian kind of experience with its small stores and not something that’s the same all the way along,” said Chadwick.

Again and again, NIMBYs focus on height when they should be agitating for better ground level design. Up to a certain point, height is never as much of an issue as people imagine it's going to be and concerns about precedent are overblown because this site and the Summerville site are unusually large and at a main intersection. There aren't really any spaces in the Beach itself that are able to accommodate something of this scale. And because the Beachers want their area preserved in amber, locations like this need to do some heavier lifting.

Of the 328 new units proposed in the city’s plan for the Queen Street East and Eastern Avenue site, city staff say approximately 98 will be affordable.

City staff also said the affordable unit costs are reflective of a new hybrid model used to allocate affordable housing, which is expected to launch later this year.

As part of the new model, the city’s application system will also include a “methodology to draw tenants from a random draw and a chronological waitlist from across the city,” a system they believe will “give equitable access to both newcomers and current Torontonians.”

The last public meeting to discuss the project, which was held in 2021, faced backlash from many members of the community, who voiced a shared concern that the proposal went against the Queen Street East Urban Design Guidelines (UDG), which limits building height along Queen Street East in the Beach between Coxwell and Neville Park avenues.


ARTICLE - https://beachmetro.com/2025/10/24/l...eeting-on-proposal-for-queen-and-coxwell-site
 
Of the 328 new units proposed in the city’s plan for the Queen Street East and Eastern Avenue site, city staff say approximately 98 will be affordable.

City staff also said the affordable unit costs are reflective of a new hybrid model used to allocate affordable housing, which is expected to launch later this year.

As part of the new model, the city’s application system will also include a “methodology to draw tenants from a random draw and a chronological waitlist from across the city,” a system they believe will “give equitable access to both newcomers and current Torontonians.”

The last public meeting to discuss the project, which was held in 2021, faced backlash from many members of the community, who voiced a shared concern that the proposal went against the Queen Street East Urban Design Guidelines (UDG), which limits building height along Queen Street East in the Beach between Coxwell and Neville Park avenues.


ARTICLE - https://beachmetro.com/2025/10/24/l...eeting-on-proposal-for-queen-and-coxwell-site

Sigh, this proposal remains an underachievement on just about every level.

It fails to maximize site potential.

It fails to renew existing public housing in poor condition.

It fails to provide as much affordable housing as possible within a mixed income development context.

It does not contemplate a public, green P parking garage here which would allow significantly reduced parking within the waterfront parklands and boost business along this stretch of Queen.

It does put a childcare centre along the same said street frontage to the detriment of both the facility itself and the streetscape.

Regrettably, as much money as has been wasted here to date, this proposal needs to be sent back the drawing board until staff learn to get it right.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top