Toronto 141 Davisville | 117.09m | 33s | Osmington Gerofsky | Wallman Architects

Completely new iteration here:

Proponent is now Osmington Gerofsky Development Corporation

Height is now 32s

Tenure is condo

@interchange42 note all the changes here (for the title/database)

1658298314611.png



Oh, and * Docs are Up *

Architect here is now Wallman:

1658298277136.png


1658298643841.png



1658298675060.png

1658298467391.png


1658299150291.png


1658299258131.png

The company has created a website for the new proposal with materials:

pailtondavisville.com

Pailton & Davisville

Planning for the Future As Toronto continues to grow, we see the need for more housing near transit. Located just minutes away from the Davisville Subway Station and many other community services and amenities, this site is the ideal location to provide homes for future residents of the...
pailtondavisville.com pailtondavisville.com
 
The new rendering is updated in the database. The developer changed from CAPREIT Limited Partnership to Osmington Gerofsky Development Group. The architect is altered from the BDP Quadrangle to Wallman architects. Overall building height changed from 16 storeys to 32 storeys. The total height changed from 59.43m to 109.90m. The total unit count changed from 143 units to 423 units. The building changed from a rental to a condo. Finally, total parking spaces changed from 206 parking to 155 parking.

Rendering is taken from the architectural plan via Rezoning submission.
 
3Dementia said:
I do like stories about storeys.

Like "what's the story on storeys" at the Grand Hotel on Jarvis (towering rendering on the hoarding ;-)?
Click to expand...

I would've sent an email to Amexon for clarification, but that might be too grand of an ask. Or as usual UT'ers will unearth an answer online before they even respond. 🤔
 
AlbertC said:
I would've sent an email to Amexon for clarification, but that might be too grand of an ask. Or as usual UT'ers will unearth an answer online before they even respond. 🤔
Click to expand...
Ok I'm guilty of very "low-hanging fruit" humour... but this "grand" stuff has already fallen off the tree (I groaned).

BTW, I've emailed Amex dozens of times but they always reply "Application Declined". 💳
 
Undead said:
3D would die because at 3.1 metres per floor, 32 storeys falls just under 100m.
Click to expand...
You know full well that my (fact-based) conspiracy theories are limited to "real skyscraper" benchmarks: 150m, 200m and 300m.

But I have some time on my hands... so maybe I will dig into those 99.9m projects that have likely been banished to the desks of junior planners who are still in the learning curve phase of the 12th floor conspiracy.
 
Decision Report - Approval Recommended to the next meeting of TEYCC:


@Paclo is flagged due to a 1s height bump, but also a reduction of height in M.

Deal for existing tenants:

1705072621664.png


***

A very small off-site parkland dedication is included:

1705072707238.png


That offsite dedication is part of the 33 Davisville proposal.

***

Not often we see this, parking has jumped:

1705072788986.png
 
ProjectEnd said:
How do you add a 3m storey to a building but reduce the overall height by 6m?

wmX6_AKaJZs.jpg
Click to expand...

I think the difference here may be that UT included height to MPH; The City is using height w/o MPH? Yup, that's it.

From the Aug '23 Arch. Plans:

1705083256278.png

*****

While I'm at it, updated renders:

1705083114715.png


1705083145129.png

1705083164965.png

1705083182530.png


1705083200890.png
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top