EnviroTO
Senior Member
People have definitely argued to tear down the portion of the Gardiner east of the DVP because it's "under capacity". Ditto for the Allen.
OK, those segments I can understand being stated as under capacity. I thought he was suggesting the argument for the elevated Gardiner in its entirety has something to do with being "under capacity". Even the arguments for removal of the Allen and the Gardiner east of the DVP have more to do with aesthetics and neighbourhood building than freeway under utilization.