News   Nov 18, 2024
Tower Crane Installed at 1071 King West While Building Gets Height Bump
 1.5K     1 
News   Nov 18, 2024
City of Toronto Introduces Measures to Protect Renters and Boost Affordable Housing Supply
 794     0 
News   Nov 18, 2024
Canada Lands Company Submits Application Outlining Downsview West District
 1.8K     1 

Streetcar Tracks on Adelaide

With this track replacement, are they installing different switches at the intersections so the streetcars don't have to drive slow through an intersection?
 
smallspy said:
There are a number of different rules that govern how cars operate through intersections, and those are the culprit, yes.

Dan
Click to expand...
Can you explain why TTC rules seem to differ from those in other cities where streetcars do not seem to need to crawl through intersections (and can pass on corners)? With poles I could see that going too fast at turns or junctions might cause the pole to 'de-wire' but that is surely not a pan problem so the difficult seems to be the rails/switches or ???
 
DSC said:
Can you explain why TTC rules seem to differ from those in other cities where streetcars do not seem to need to crawl through intersections (and can pass on corners)? With poles I could see that going too fast at turns or junctions might cause the pole to 'de-wire' but that is surely not a pan problem so the difficult seems to be the rails/switches or ???
Click to expand...
As is the case with so many other things, the rules that the TTC has instituted over the years have been as a result of various incidents. The colloquialism "each rule is written in blood" could apply, although thankfully there were no major injuries or deaths.

Trolley poles did cause slow orders in very specific areas, but not at intersections. The speeds through an intersection would never be high enough to cause issues with the shoe trailing through the overhead. But low overhead, such as at many of the old "subways" (railway overheads) requires a slow order so that the pole - or that pantograph, for that matter - to not compress or extend too quickly.

The two most famous rules - the stop-and-stay, and 10km/h over specialwork - are a result of accidents at intersections about 20+ years ago. But the switches were not the cause at either of them - rather operator speeding was. In both cases, cars approached switches set to diverging at speeds far faster than the system could reset them. It wouldn't matter what the switch hardware was in either case.

Dan
 
smallspy said:
The two most famous rules - the stop-and-stay, and 10km/h over specialwork - are a result of accidents at intersections about 20+ years ago. But the switches were not the cause at either of them - rather operator speeding was. In both cases, cars approached switches set to diverging at speeds far faster than the system could reset them. It wouldn't matter what the switch hardware was in either case.

Dan
Click to expand...

Dan, other than having the TTC simply 'ease up'. Do you see any good alternative management strategies to allow greater speed, but not 'dangerous' speed in such cases?
 
'The streetcar track 'gaps' on Adelaide are being filled 'as I write". The gap just west of Victoria has its base layer of concrete plus the new rails (they were welding the last (?) joint a few minutes ago. It needs the top layer of concrete. The section from just west of Bay to just west of Sheppard has been excavated and they were busily pouring the base layer of concrete.

Next they have to repair sidewalks from Victoria to York and repave that stretch too.

Work on the overhead is proceeding with the hangers mostly up from Spadina to University. No actual wires yet but ....

If MLX had got their act together (well, we can hope) we might actually see streetcars on this street soon but there now are rails waiting on Queen just west of York so it IS coming closer.
 
Last edited:
Northern Light said:
Dan, other than having the TTC simply 'ease up'. Do you see any good alternative management strategies to allow greater speed, but not 'dangerous' speed in such cases?
Click to expand...
Nothing that I've seen of late leads me to hold out much hope management-wise. Everything is knee-jerk and reactive - and has been for a long time. The finger pointing needs to stop. Rather than divisions and sections trying their damnedest to avoid being pitted with the blame, everyone should be working together to try and get down to the bottom of the problem, and work together to not only find a solution, but to also find a way to prevent it from happening again.

That's hard enough to try and do all that in my organization of 25 employees. I can't fathom the effort required in one of 14,000.

The biggest issue was, is, and will be for quite some time (it seems), the "NA" switch activation system. In theory, once it gets replaced a number of the restrictions around operating through specialwork can be lifted.

But will they? I have my doubts.

Dan
 
smallspy said:
Nothing that I've seen of late leads me to hold out much hope management-wise. Everything is knee-jerk and reactive - and has been for a long time. The finger pointing needs to stop. Rather than divisions and sections trying their damnedest to avoid being pitted with the blame, everyone should be working together to try and get down to the bottom of the problem, and work together to not only find a solution, but to also find a way to prevent it from happening again.

That's hard enough to try and do all that in my organization of 25 employees. I can't fathom the effort required in one of 14,000.

The biggest issue was, is, and will be for quite some time (it seems), the "NA" switch activation system. In theory, once it gets replaced a number of the restrictions around operating through specialwork can be lifted.

But will they? I have my doubts.

Dan
Click to expand...
What's so frustrating is that, based on your recent posts, not only does there appear to be no effort from the TTC to address the multiple issues surrounding the streetcars, they're also spending hundred of millions ordering more of them. Money that probably would have been better spent on upkeeping the Subway network.

Shiny new streetcars, riding on new tracks on Adelaide, yet same crap, slow service. I love it!
 
Some progress on the section east of Yonge that was missing track:

IMG_7583.jpeg

1712719447807.jpeg
 
Bojaxs said:
What's so frustrating is that, based on your recent posts, not only does there appear to be no effort from the TTC to address the multiple issues surrounding the streetcars, they're also spending hundred of millions ordering more of them. Money that probably would have been better spent on upkeeping the Subway network.

Shiny new streetcars, riding on new tracks on Adelaide, yet same crap, slow service. I love it!
Click to expand...
Perhaps part of the issue is what is perceived as a "problem".

At this point, I'm not convinced that anyone higher-up thinks that there is a problem with the streetcars, other than we need more of them - and to be fair, they do. There was a very, very serious underestimation of what the ridership growth in that part of the network would be after the replacement of the CLRVs.

But do they think that there is a problem with the way the streetcars are run? Do they hear the complaints on here that they operate too slowly? It doesn't seem like it. And maybe that's the problem - it needs to be brought to their attention.

Dan
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1
smallspy said:
But do they think that there is a problem with the way the streetcars are run? Do they hear the complaints on here that they operate too slowly? It doesn't seem like it. And maybe that's the problem - it needs to be brought to their attention.

Dan
Click to expand...
The old saying "There's none so blind as those who will not see" comes to mind! Anyone paying even minimal attention to transit users or transit blogs knows that the route management of the surface network is shameful. Steve Munro publishes excellent (and exhaustive/exhausting!) reports that show clearly that the problem is not (mainly) "too much traffic'.
 
DSC said:
The old saying "There's none so blind as those who will not see" comes to mind! Anyone paying even minimal attention to transit users or transit blogs knows that the route management of the surface network is shameful. Steve Munro publishes excellent (and exhaustive/exhausting!) reports that show clearly that the problem is not (mainly) "too much traffic'.
Click to expand...
Oh, I completely agree on all counts. And my understanding is that at least some of the higher-ups at the TTC know about them. And honestly, the TTC has enough data points at their own disposal - and commentary from those closer to the ground - that they should be able to arrive at those same conclusions.

Now, whether they do anything with them/that information..... that's a totally different question, and one for which I don't have an answer.

Dan
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top