News   Aug 02, 2024
 194     0 
News   Aug 02, 2024
 963     1 
News   Aug 02, 2024
 787     1 

Star: Spending, tax policies hurting Toronto: Report

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
33,440
Reaction score
29,301
Location
Toronto
From the Star:

Spending, tax policies hurting Toronto: Report
Jun 25, 2008 01:39 PM
RITA TRICHUR
BUSINESS REPORTER

Torontonians are worried that the city is losing its ranking as Canada's top business hub and are reportedly blaming city hall for chasing away companies due to a culture of wasteful spending and unfavourable tax policies, says a new report from the Fraser Institute.

The think-tank's study - entitled Is Toronto in Decline? Worrying Trends from the Census - argues that Toronto is "failing to keep pace with other Canadian cities" as its median income lags the national average and the city haemorrhages coveted management, business and finance jobs.

Accompanying that research is a COMPAS opinion poll that underscores "growing" concern among residents that "city hall is failing to adequately plan for the future." A total of 653 Toronto residents participated in the survey earlier this month. The findings are considered accurate to within 3.8 percentage points 19 times out of 20.

Sixty-two per cent of respondents said the city does not spend money efficiently and 63 per cent believe its tax policies are driving business away. Moreover, 40 per cent of those surveyed worry Toronto is falling behind other domestic business centres such as Calgary or Vancouver.

"The people of Toronto are looking for leadership and a vision for their city and the future," said Mike Harris, Fraser Institute senior fellow and former Ontario premier.

"They are calling for control over their taxes through a referendum, a response to the waste and lack of direction coming from city hall."

Don Wanagas, a spokesperson for Mayor David Miller, declined comment on the Fraser Institute's report.

The study bases its economic analysis on data from the 2006 census. Cities used as "points of comparison" include London, Ottawa, Halifax, Montreal, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver.

The study found that median income in Toronto grew by a meagre four per cent from 2000. During that same period, Ontario's median income grew by 10 per cent, while the national average was 16 per cent.

Among Canadian cities, Edmonton posted the highest growth in median income at 26 per cent followed by Saskatoon and Calgary at 21 and 20 per cent, respectively, the study said.

"A key marker of a city's economic health is the income level of its residents. Since 2000, Toronto has lagged behind the Canadian average," Harris added.

The study also argues that Toronto is "bleeding management occupations." Additionally, Toronto is the only city among those studied that recorded a loss of business, finance and administration occupations.

The report says that loss stands in sharp contrast to the 9.3 per cent increase in this area across Canada and 9.6 per cent increase in cities other than Toronto.

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/449218
________________________________________________

http://www.fraserinstitute.org/Commerce.Web/product_files/Toronto_in_decline.pdf

AoD
 
Coming from the Fraser Institute, I'm not really going to give what they say much credence. Yes, median income has grown slowly in Toronto, but note that cost of living increases have been ridiculous in Edmonton, Calgary, and Saskatoon, not to mention serious labour shortages. Of course income levels will have to increase at a faster rate. As for the loss of jobs, that's something that's happening on more of a regional scale, with jobs moving to the 905. We've known this for years, and the report completely fails to mention that Toronto is in the process of shifting the tax burden from business to residential, to improve our business tax competitiveness.

If we're doing so horribly, why are there multiple new office towers going up downtown?
 
I'm with 299. The credibility of the Fraser Institute on Toronto's problems is, for me, lacking. How they could write a report like this and not mention equalization transfers from Ontario to other provinces is mind-boggling. For instance, the TTC has to make up for a much lower subsidy from the province than other transit systems, but they don't address why that might be.

The Fraser Institute is a hammer and every problem to them is a nail - ie., tax cuts.
 
Is this not really an attempt by Mike Harris to defend his legacy in against the growing acknowledgment that he screwed things up?

Oh yeah, it's all just waste on the part of the city government. Not the added cost of social services that YOU downloaded?

High city taxes are to blame but not the higher education tax rates that YOU grabbed while stripping away the higher funding of Toronto's schools?

Really!?! Asshole.

On a more moderate note...there's a lot of hand wringing about Ontario's lower rate of income growth RELATIVE to the rest of Canada. Why? I'm concerned about our income growth relative to inflation. I don't mind if people are getting richer elsewhere. Good for them! Good for regional economic equality. It should reduce our equalization pay out.
 
Why the Toronto Star would even give any ligitimacy to this bullsh*t by publishing it on the website is almost beyond me. I wonder how the questions were framed in the poll.

Fraser Institute and Mike Harris lecturing Toronto on taxes is the product of the same mentality that Jim Flaherty's lecturing gets him. That got so out of line that there's now sympathy for Ontario from Newfoundland of all places. Hopefully the Oshawa-Whitby people will keep both Flaherty and the GM closings in mind in the next election.

Mike Harris lecturing Toronto on its problems is like telling the people of Walkerton that it was their own fault for drinking contaminated water.
 
I do not understand why doesn't the city lower business taxes and just put it on homeowners.

Their taxes are already lower then the rest of the GTA, and the other cities are now raising their business taxes.


Its a perfect time and would easily reboot the city's economy.

However the Mayor is more concerned about making the city a socialist paradise. I agree it has kept our quality of life very high but its useless if our economy is not doing well. If the economy does not do well, the quality of life will decrease no matter how many social programs we create.

The city needs to stop focusing only on social issues and should look at economic and business issues.
 
However the Mayor is more concerned about making the city a socialist paradise. I agree it has kept our quality of life very high but its useless if our economy is not doing well. If the economy does not do well, the quality of life will decrease no matter how many social programs we create.

The city needs to stop focusing only on social issues and should look at economic and business issues.

Have you ever made a comment about the mayor without using the word socialist? Please, provide some examples as to how Miller has made Toronto into a "socialist paradise".

I do not understand why doesn't the city lower business taxes and just put it on homeowners.
Get informed.
 
The study bases its economic analysis on data from the 2006 census. Cities used as "points of comparison" include London, Ottawa, Halifax, Montreal, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver.

London? Winnipeg? Saskatoon? Calgary?

Is this not comparing apples to oranges on so many different levels?




Sad to see Mike Harris is still gainfully employed in screwing Toronto.
 
Further to that, Toronto took advantage of its strong manufacturing and commercial base back in the 'good ol' days' to tax those sectors, while maintaining low residential rates to keep people from fleeing the city and to the 905. Today, it's the opposite, so now we're reversing that trend to provide more balanced tax rates. In the end, I think this will be best... a good residential tax rate, and a good business tax rate... and as the 905 runs out of development charge gold, they'll have to start taxing their businesses more, and lead to a level playing field throughout the GTA.
 
Have you ever made a comment about the mayor without using the word socialist? Please, provide some examples as to how Miller has made Toronto into a "socialist paradise".


Unions...

his relationship with Unions is one of the "other reason" why the city faces financial issues and we receive such crappy TTC service. I like the fact he has really done wonders for the downtown but he has no gone way to far to the left.


I do not understand why doesn't the city lower business taxes and just put it on homeowners.

Good to hear that and it should help the city as the suburban cities are raising their business taxes.
 
I wouldn't support a tax cut just for the sake of cutting taxes, but I would support increasing the efficiency of city government. My job is such that I have to interact with the municipal government almost daily, and the inefficiencies are shocking and deeply entrenched in the way that the City operates.

City Hall needs a massive overhaul, and could easily provide the same level of service to the citizens of Toronto by trimming 20% of the workforce overnight.
 
Fire All The Air Traffic Controllers!!
 

Back
Top