News   Nov 15, 2024
 1.8K     6 
News   Nov 15, 2024
 1.6K     1 
News   Nov 15, 2024
 1.8K     0 

Simcoe Growth Pressure

Here's who to yell at!

While I'm telling everyone to complain to the government about this asinine decision I suppose I should make sure everyone knows who to yell at! :D

The minister responsible's contact info is below.

Watson, Hon. Jim
Phone: 416-585-7000 Fax: 416-585-6470 Email: jim.watson@ontario.ca
Address:
Hon. Jim Watson
Minister - MINISTER'S OFFICE
17th Flr
777 Bay St
Toronto ON M5G2E5

***

Or contact the Premier.

Dalton McGuinty, Premier
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1

OR submit electronic feedback to him:

https://www.premier.gov.on.ca/feedback/feedback.asp?Lang=EN
 
Uh, if the provincial government were somehow in the pocket of the development industry as you suggest, Northern Light, we wouldn't have the Greenbelt or Places to Grow. This is what's so frustrating with environmental policy. Governments never get any credit for doing the right thing, because it's never good enough. I agree that there are holes in Places to Grow that need to be plugged, including Simcoe, but that's why they're extending the growth planning to that area. It's definitely not perfect, but it's a lot better than what's happening in most major cities, including Portland where Vancouver, WA is sprawling without limit.
 
Official plans need revisions: province
http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1699170
COUNTY

Posted By RAYMOND BOWE

Updated 3 days ago

The province has given several local municipalities up to another year to get their official plans in line with Simcoe County's, which the province sent back for revisions.

Updated information is expected to be presented at the Aug. 25 county council meeting, including provincial recommendations regarding the Simcoe Area: Strategic Vision for Growth. That information will include where 40,000 people live and work, to be reallocated in the county's growth plan.

The province released Simcoe Area: A Strategic Vision For Growth, recognizing that Simcoe County's proposed new Official Plan required clearer growth management direction.

The province asked for revisions to the county's growth plan, but county officials say they won't be able to meet with provincial officials until after the summer break.

"The difficulty is we're unable to meet with the province to address these concerns," Simcoe County Warden Tony Guergis said. "We didn't disagree with what the province is saying. There still needs to be responsible growth, (but) we want to have a comfort level on both sides."

Several local municipalities have written the province asking that the June 16 deadline be extended so their official plans conform with the Greater Golden Horseshoe Growth Plan, which was approved under the Places to Grow Act in 2005.

Those municipalities include Penetanguishene, Wasaga Beach, Bradford West Gwillimbury, Collingwood and Midland, as well as Severn, Essa, Clearview, Ramara, Tiny, Oro-Medonte and Adjala-Tosorontio townships.

This new provincial document identifies key 'urban nodes' to focus growth and intensification, allocating people and jobs to those areas to curb urban sprawl. Barrie is the largest, while Orillia, Collingwood, Alliston (New Tecumseth) and Bradford are given smaller growth status.

Adjala-Tosorontio Mayor Tom Walsh said county councillors have not been kept in the loop by county staff.

Planning director Bryan MacKell said Simcoe County's Official Plan is being updated almost daily.

"We're looking forward to a very comprehensive document," MacKell said, adding it will not go to the province without county council's approval.


It's been a "long, arduous" task, MacKell said, trying to meet with provincial officials, a notion supported by Simcoe County CAO Mark Aitken, who said the province "has cancelled umpteen meetings because they weren't ready."

Severn Township's Official Plan is being appealed at the Ontario Municipal Board.

The lower-tier municipalities' official plans must be in accordance with Simcoe County's before they can be OK'd.

Municipalities also have until Sept. 2 to provide feedback on Simcoe Area: A Strategic Vision For Growth.

"Timing is an issue," Guergis said.

Article ID# 1699170
 
York slams province over sprawl
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/693432



Cites double standard as massive employment zone sanctioned on 400
Sep 10, 2009 04:30 AM
PHINJO GOMBU
URBAN AFFAIRS REPORTER

Provincial plans to allow large employment zones along Highway 400 in Simcoe County could suck jobs out of York Region just as the region is spending billions on transit and other infrastructure meant to combat sprawl.

Such development, particularly in Bradford West Gwillimbury and Innisfil, may also damage Lake Simcoe and undermine Ontario's new Lake Simcoe Protection Act, York Region staff say in a report passed by the regional planning committee yesterday.

The report echoes concerns expressed last week in York's official response to something called the Simcoe Strategy.

The "strategy," released by the province in June, calls for more urbanization than originally envisioned in Simcoe County and requires an amendment to the Places to Grow Act, a long-term plan to curb sprawl and manage growth.

The move came under fire from critics earlier this year. It's feared that allowing a massive employment zone along the 400 – in a deal quietly negotiated among the province, municipal officials and major developers – will lead to unchecked sprawl from the northern edge of the Greenbelt to Barrie.

"Developers and employers seeking lower land prices are likely to gravitate to the new provincial employment area designations in Bradford West Gwillimbury and Innisfil," the York staff report states.

"This trend may compete with employment growth from York Region where significant investment in infrastructure has already been made," the report continues, adding that York may now have difficulty meeting its own long-term employment forecasts.

Billions of dollars are being spent on the Viva bus rapid transit network, roads and plans for live-work communities and intensification within the region.

The report asks that the impact on GTA municipalities be studied before the province opens up new fronts for development in Simcoe.

It repeats York's long-held position that leapfrogging development over the Greenbelt will "exacerbate existing issues of congestion" for commuters who travel between Simcoe and the GTA.

It says the province has yet to undertake a formal review of such development.

It also questions the government's double standard – challenging York Region's proposed employment zones south of the Greenbelt, while supporting the Simcoe zones.

Because there's more growth being forecast now in Simcoe, York officials and politicians are pushing hard for the controversial Bradford Bypass, a highway linking Highway 400 to Highway 404 – which the province has so far insisted is not on the books.

York Region is now calling for widening the 400-series highways and building 12 new modified interchanges – building on concerns expressed last year about the lack of planning for public transportation that would link Simcoe and the GTA.


At one point, the province was prepared to challenge the proposed employment zones in Simcoe before the Ontario Municipal Board, saying there was already more than enough land approved for development.

But under pressure, in part from concerns that Toromont, a Vaughan manufacturer and distributor of heavy equipment, might move to Manitoba if it weren't allowed to relocate operations to the Highway 400 corridor, the province changed its tune.

Officials now say the new zones are more appropriately located.






You can read the reports here
http://www.york.ca/Regional+Government/Agendas+Minutes+and+Reports/_2009/PEDC+sep+9.htm
 
Last edited:
Yeah if simcoe grows a lot the 400 will be overloaded and it is mostly south of Highway 7.


Here I am not in favour of widening the 400 because here it will certainly create more sprawl.

Making the 400 some super 8-10 lane highway will convince many people to move up and along the 400 all the way up to Barrie.
 
I agree, the 400 shouldn't be widened. In fact, I don't think any highways need to or should be widened.

I also oppose the 400 employment lands. Simcoe should be focusing on employment in Collingwood/Wasaga Beach (thinking industrial, but there's a lot of possibility for even more resorts,) and inside Barrie as offices and other commercial employment.

And I seriously hate the 404. If I had the power, I'd tear it down right now. It was really only needed up to Highway 7, maybe 16th or Major Mac. It was a mistake to ever put it up to Newmarket, and a 400-404 bridge really doesn't have much merit at all, IMO.


Simcoe really seems to be making a mess of things. From the never ending disagreements with Barrie to the rather large flaws in it's growth plan, I really don't quite get what's going through their heads.
 
Yeah I only support the widening of the 401 well because it really its the main road of the province...
 
Mattamy puts its 'small city' east of Alliston back on the County's agenda
Posted October 13, 2009
http://www.madhunt.com/mattamy-county-pln-20091013.htm

Click to read the submission to Simcoe County

The land use planning consultants for Mattamy Homes and Ontario Potato Distributing have resumed efforts to "reiterate the merits of our client's" 2,900 acre "proposed planned community" between Alliston and Beeton "within the context of the proposed new Simcoe County Official Plan."

In his letter dated September 14, and included on the agenda of Simcoe County council's corporate services committee meeting tomorrow morning, Peter Walker, of Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Ltd., suggests Alliston's designation as one of five urban nodes by the Province through its "Simcoe Area Strategic Vision for Growth", matches what his clients are proposing to build out.

"The proposed community seeks to resolve a number of important planning issues in the Town and southern Simcoe County, such as creating an opportunity for the existing large workforce of the area to work within the Town and also to live there," according to Mr. Walker. "This opportunity currently does not exist in Alliston or the New Tecumseth area. Currently, over 70 per cent of the people working in New Tecumseth do not live in the Town, thereby creating a major in-commuting pattern with associated traffic congestion. This is not consistent with the many objectives of the Province's Places to Grow policies including complete communities."

This proposal to build 15,000 new homes unveiled in June 2003 was rejected in 2004 as premature by a newly installed council mandated to defeat what at the time was referred to as the Cappuccitti development, they just retrenched and waited out Simcoe County's growth planning studies and OP update.

The proposed Cappuccitti development was such a galvanizing issue with widespread opposition that it dominated the November 2003 municipal election campaign, and his support of the development cost then mayor Larry Keogh his seat to Mike MacEachern, who was opposed to it as a councillor.

The subject site as first proposed was bounded by the Nottawasaga River to the north, Bailey Creek to the south, Tottenham Road to the west, and 10 Sideroad to the east. In 2002-03 when it first surfaced as a proposal, the Cappuccitti family owned less than half the area selected.

In addition to housing, the project would include open spaces, public places, walking and biking trails, ponds, parkettes, woodlots, river views and vistas, school sites, civic centre, commercial core, new 50 acre hospital site, and satellite college campus.

The development interests, fronted then and now by former Richmond Hill mayor Al Duffy, spent the intervening years lobbying at the provincial level and pitching their idea of building a pipeline that would pump treated effluent into Georgian Bay, a matter referenced in Mr. Walker's letter.

Mr. Duffy said this morning via email that "we are moving the project to the front burner."

Mayor Mike MacEachern noted that "the proponent continues to raise the project at a variety of government levels but it has not progressed any further since it was deemed premature several years ago."
 
^^ You're totally right. It's just that the mindset we're in (that being generally pro-car and pro suburban lifestyle,) means that there's much more demand for full houses than apartments, lofts, condos, whatever you will.

The government should really be creating a plan to turn the tide to put higher density living at least at par with, if not to gain more overall demand for higher density than suburbs. I think that it would be a great challenge to undertake.

A city like Barrie could very well have it's very own CBD, with medium/high density condos, probably in a mixed use setting with a large Tourist/resort area on the waterfront. I have to be honest, it could never be self-sufficient in terms of residents:jobs, simply that it's only an hour away form Toronto and funnels in there well, but wouldn't be as economical to try to build a large economy separate from the GTA. It might still be a bedroom community to the GTA, but it would at least have an independent economy that would probably benefit the entire GTA. Doing so would also build up a big culture in the area, which could further encourage higher density development.
 
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/737933--planner-slams-simcoe-sprawl
A damning memo from Ontario's senior planner paints a stark picture of unsustainable sprawl, congestion and skyrocketing infrastructure costs if the province proceeds with a controversial strategy to urbanize large swaths of Simcoe County north of the Greenbelt.

The warning by Victor Doyle, a key architect of the groundbreaking Greenbelt plan, focuses on the combined impact of lightning-speed growth in Barrie and proposals to create two massive employment zones along pastoral Highway 400 in Bradford West Gwillimbury and Innisfil.
 
Thanks for posting that article! Simcoe politicians seem to have a different perspective ;)

County councillors criticize province
AUTHOR: LAURIE WATT
Date: Dec 08, 2009
http://www.midlandmirror.com/midlandmirror/article/151580

MIDHURST – Ontario just doesn’t understand, Simcoe County politicians say.

They argue Queen’s Park doesn’t get the growth pressures local municipalities face as GTA residents retire to their cottages full time.

And, they add, the Dalton McGuinty government doesn’t understand how limiting growth to urban centres will hamper the viability of small municipalities.

The suggested fix is to allocate the county 40,000 more people – in addition to the 40,000 the province allocated in June, mostly to Barrie. It would bring the region’s population to 707,000 by 2031.

That’s the message Simcoe County councillors delivered Dec. 3 as they put Municipal Affairs and Housing regional director Larry Clay on the hot seat.

At a special meeting to discuss growth planning and intergovernmental relations, councillors lambasted the province for holding up the county’s official plan, and for delaying development proposals in Innisfil and Bradford/West Gwillimbury.

“The province is … not providing adequate direction,” said former warden and current Bradford/West Gwillimbury Deputy Mayor Dennis Roughley.

[...]

Clay said the county plan, which spreads growth throughout the region, runs contrary to provincial policy.

“There were elements of the plan that, from the province’s perspective, are not in keeping with the Places to Grow Act. The province released a draft strategy, the Simcoe Vision, and it suggests some changes to how growth is distributed and how growth will occur in Simcoe County. It is more in keeping with our objectives,” he told county council.

He explained what a “complete community” is, and why it’s important to focus growth there to make best use of services such as water, sewers, health and recreation.

“At the end of the day, it’s everyone’s tax dollar, and we have to spend it in ways that make the most sense,” said Clay.

Places to Grow provides a plan not just for Simcoe County, but also for the entire Greater Golden Horseshoe region. Recognizing growth pressures, environmental pressures and the need to make the most of Ontario’s economic engine, Places to Grow directs more of the province’s growth westward, to regions like Kitchener-Waterloo and Niagara.

Growth, by contrast, is relatively limited here in order to preserve agricultural land.

Left unhampered, growth would drive Simcoe County’s population to 1.2 million, a county report projected, partially due to development leapfrogging over the Green Belt between the county and the GTA.
 
Last edited:
Planner slams Simcoe sprawl

Some news from the other side of the green belt

Planner slams Simcoe sprawl
Key Ontario official warns his counterparts development along 400 could spiral out of control



Published On Sat Dec 12 2009
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/737933--planner-slams-simcoe-sprawl

A damning memo from Ontario's senior planner paints a stark picture of unsustainable sprawl, congestion and skyrocketing infrastructure costs if the province proceeds with a controversial strategy to urbanize large swaths of Simcoe County north of the Greenbelt.

The warning by Victor Doyle, a key architect of the groundbreaking Greenbelt plan, focuses on the combined impact of lightning-speed growth in Barrie and proposals to create two massive employment zones along pastoral Highway 400 in Bradford West Gwillimbury and Innisfil.

"The cumulative effect will be to open up a new linear pattern of urban sprawl along Highway 400 running virtually from the Holland Marsh to north of Barrie," Doyle wrote in the September letter directed at Ontario's Growth Secretariat and obtained by the Star.

What happens in Simcoe may determine whether a bold attempt to curb sprawl in the GTA ultimately succeeds or fails.

Doyle writes that the province's so-called Simcoe Strategy, to be finalized in the next few months, follows a "pattern strikingly similar" to what happened in York Region along the Yonge St. corridor. That kind of sprawling development wasn't supposed to happen ever again under the province's vaunted Places to Grow plan.

"It is the litmus test," acknowledges Melanie Hare, a planner with Urban Strategies, a leading consultancy group that has helped shape growth plans for municipalities in Halton, York and Durham regions.
Hare said what the province does in Simcoe sets the stage for how it will respond to the requests of GTA municipalities for similar urban boundary expansions – including major employment zones.

The Simcoe Strategy, for which the government invited public comment, calls for more urbanization than originally envisioned in south Simcoe and requires a legislative amendment to Places to Grow.

Doyle's letter, though he submitted it as a private individual, is unusual in that it involves a senior planner from one ministry (municipal affairs) writing to another, the infrastructure ministry, criticizing a potentially ill-considered planning decision.

Brad Graham, assistant deputy minister with the Growth Secretariat, told the Star yesterday he had not spoken with Doyle about his memo but said it would be considered along with others put forward by stakeholders.

The provincial plan has already come under attack from York Region, which fears the proposed Highway 400 industrial zones could exacerbate highway congestion and suck jobs out of the region – just as it is spending billions of dollars on transit and other anti-sprawl infrastructure.

York accuses the province of a double standard – challenging York's proposal for employment zones along a well-populated stretch of the 400, while supporting the Simcoe proposal, which happens to be attractive to industry because the isolated land is cheaper.

Environmental groups accuse Queen's Park of caving in to development interests, while the Greater Toronto Countryside Mayors' Alliance questions the wisdom of encouraging "leapfrogging" development in areas that have little or no services, such as sewer lines.

Doyle's memorandum argues that:

The GTA has 34,000 hectares of developable land, so there's no need to urbanize a prime agricultural area that hasn't been serviced and isn't connected to existing towns.
Simcoe County's own analysis shows it has enough approved lands to accommodate 100,000 more people than needed between now and 2031, so there's no need to pull in new land.

Research shows the focus should be on employment zones to the west side of the GTA (Halton, Peel and western York Region), an area already serviced by interconnecting highways, airports and proximity to the U.S. market.
Lake Simcoe, already threatened by phosphorous from runoff, is protected by a groundbreaking environment ministry plan to limit development. It would be prohibitively expensive to build another "big (sewage) pipe" to link Collingwood to Alliston, Bradford West Gwillimbury and Barrie.
Simcoe County has been the subject of intense land speculation, especially since the Greenbelt's creation put areas farther south off-limits. That's one reason why the Places to Grow plan limits Simcoe's 2031 population target to 667,000 people – double what it is today, but far less than the 1.2 million that could have moved in, considering the number of suburban housing applications in the pipeline.

Bradford was in the news earlier this year when the province quietly negotiated a settlement with a development group, led by Geranium and Metrus, for about 500 hectares of unserviced land near Highways 400 and 88.

Months later, the province said it would consider another massive parcel along the 400 in Innisfil for a second employment zone.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top