euler
Active Member
I used to cover courts back in the day. IIRC, trials were conducted by a judge alone in cases that proceeded by summary conviction. That is, lesser offences with a maximum sentence of two years or less. Juries became an option in cases that proceeded by indictment, where crimes were more serious and carried sentences of more than two years. The defendant under indictment could chose to have his/her trial heard by a jury or judge alone.
Indictable and summary can be summarized as "more and less serious" but the maximum for summary is 6mo, not 2 years. Plenty of charges are requested (and granted) to be tried as indictable but do not carry a possible maximum sentence of 5 years which would invoke your right to a jury trial.
Some light reading... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_offence#Canada
I would know, I was tried for an indictable offence and was not given the option of a jury trial (as if I would have taken it anyway)