No one is saying that it wasn't, but that doesn't mean that every single thing that happens along the way is actually a part of the screw ups. Train control problems within the first month of operations is on a much different level than the maintenance company literally being unable to keep up with routine maintenance 6 months in. They shouldn't be reported or even considered to be the same.
But that's not the same, wheel lifespan should exceed 6 months, and cracks this early on are unprecedented. I suspect Alstom or the wheel subcontractor didn't do their homework on Ottawa's climate when they engineered the bogies. That is negligence.
Thats because you havent seen an LRT project given so much attention for every little problem. Your perceptions are swayed by news media.
Every single megaproject project gets insane media attention for its shortcomings. iON had its fair share too, even with regards to more abstract issues.
Remember the Metro line in Edmonton? How about the MUNI Central subway? The Toronto Streetcar Fiasco? The North Shore Project in Pittsburgh? The Green Line extension? The 512 LRT Conversion? The ECLRT? Pretty much every "modern streetcar" line? All these projects received immense criticism for poor planning, construction, or serviceability, and yet, none of them have experienced near the number of issues as the Confederation line.
What about the criticism of other transit projects (those that aren't light rail)? HART, the SAS, East Side Access, Gateway, the Silver Line Extension, BART expansions to San Jose, California HSR, the R179 Fiasco, the Canada Line, NYC subway revitalization, the Sheppard Subway, the TYSSE, the Red/Purple Lines, the Union Station modernization, among so many other transit expansions were massively criticized by their local media sources for issues they experienced.
This isn't some conspiracy of the Ottawa Newsmedia screwing over LRT, it's an issue of poor engineering and management of the consortium.
For example, the ION project had its share of issues that local observers were aware of, but which were rarely discussed in the anti-LRT local media because it was genuinely too clueless to pay attention aside from churning out variations of the same op ed complaining about LRT "stealing road space" every 2-3 months. The only issue they really picked up on aside from that was the obvious delays in getting the LRVs, not stuff like the signals issues that were never fully ironed out until months after launch.
I recall extensive reporting on the lack of ATP. The difference between iON's issues and Ottawa's is that the lack of ATP on iON delays a run by like 2 minutes and maintains frequencies 2 minutes worse than what a system with ATP. That's hardly a dealbreaker from a service standpoint, whereas we've seen train failures left, right, and center in Ottawa.
If the confederation line is regularly down >50% of scheduled service due to vehicle issues, that's not an anomoly, that's a flaw.