News   May 06, 2024
 279     0 
News   May 06, 2024
 469     0 
News   May 06, 2024
 1.2K     1 

Ontario in the Creative Age

Whoaccio

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
1,686
Reaction score
0
*Mods, this is an Ontario issue, but the authors give quite a lot of attention to focusing on Toronto and other cities and their role. I decided Toronto issues may be appropriate, but please relocate if necessary.

To make a long story short, Dalton McGuinty apparently commissioned a study a while back to examine the possible futures of Ontario's economy which, as most know, has seen better days. The report was done by the MPI's Roger Martin & Richard Florida.

From the G&M
KAREN HOWLETT

From Thursday's Globe and Mail

February 5, 2009 at 5:35 AM EST

TORONTO — The once-in-a-lifetime economic crisis should spur governments to look beyond stimulus schemes to save industrial jobs and toward ways to nurture the occupations that can build future prosperity, says urban thinker Richard Florida.

"These kind of crises - 1873, 1929, 2008 - they don't come around that often, and they force people to think in a new way," he said in an interview yesterday. "Now, you've got to say, 'what are we going to do?' "

In a report to be released today, Dr. Florida and co-author Roger Martin, dean of the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management, have laid out their blueprint for the future, one in which virtually every worker, from dry cleaners to biomedical engineers, and every nook and cranny of Canada reaps the benefits of a creative economy.

The report focuses exclusively on Ontario; it was commissioned by Premier Dalton McGuinty. But its findings apply all across Canada as every province makes the transformation from an industrial society to a creative one.

The authors say the boundaries separating old industrial cities, Canada's North and rural regions from the burgeoning hotbeds of creative, knowledge-driven activity must be torn down. The creative economy must give rise to a new geographic structure consisting of a series of cities and suburbs linked together by rapid-transit systems and communications networks, the report says.

"In the past, you could have your own island economy," Dr. Florida said. "Now we have to connect mega-regions."

Canada's future prosperity hinges on its ability to nurture and develop the creative skills of its workers. Ontario is on the front lines of making the transition as its manufacturing heartland undergoes wrenching change.

The province is an interesting case study, because its economy consists of industrial auto plants and factories, remote rural regions and three distinct creative clusters in the Toronto, Ottawa and Kitchener-Waterloo areas, Dr. Florida said.

Ontario has lost thousands of manufacturing jobs in recent years. Many of these jobs have vanished forever as manufacturing plants shut down, reduce their work force or pull up stakes altogether. The province's road to prosperity hinges on making the transition from an economy based on physical labour to one based on the brainpower of its workers.

Ontario has a long way to go, the report says.

For starters, the province does not place a high enough premium on knowledge workers. This not only prevents the province from attracting the best and the brightest from around the world, it also likely accounts for the brain drain of talented professionals leaving Ontario for greener pastures, Dr. Florida said.

Wages for creative workers are lower in Ontario than in 14 other jurisdictions examined by the authors. These include British Columbia, Alberta and Quebec as well as Arizona, Illinois, Michigan, New York and Ohio.

The province values physical labour more than analytical and social skills, the report says. While that may have worked well in the industrial age, it will slow down its transition from an economy based on physical brawn to one based on human creativity, it adds.

"We have not rewarded our cognitive skills," Dr. Florida said, adding that this is not a function of the mix of jobs.

Much of the report has a utopian feel to it, because the authors' vision for the future is dramatically at odds with current reality. The authors acknowledge as much, by outlining a number of other steps the province must take.

Ontario should be viewed as the world's most talented jurisdiction, with enough highly skilled workers to fill the 70 per cent of new jobs that will call for a college or university education. Ontario should also have the social safety nets that would provide basic goods for those in need and greater opportunity for every person to fulfill his or her creative talents, including early childhood development programs.

"This is the highest payoff investment we can make in our long-run prosperity," the report says. "As we have seen, early childhood development is key to the full development of human capabilities and talent."

So, what are your thoughts? Is the so called "creative class" our ticket out of these doldrums? Or will the loss of the "good jobs" in manufacturing for ever knock the center out of Ontario's society and economy, unless stopped? As it relates to Toronto, what is our role in all of this?
 
There's no reason why we can't have both. That's been the key to Ontario's prosperity until now. Places like Germany have managed to retain their industrial base while embracing the new creative economy. It would be a grave mistake to abandon our industrial sector in the hopes of new jobs elsewhere. The British did it, and see how well it worked for them: poverty and mass unemployment almost everywhere outside the southeast, and now calamity in London as well.
 
What's their definition of "creative" anyway? Does founding, managing and writing (blogging?) for an online magazine count?
 
There's no reason why we can't have both. That's been the key to Ontario's prosperity until now. Places like Germany have managed to retain their industrial base while embracing the new creative economy. It would be a grave mistake to abandon our industrial sector in the hopes of new jobs elsewhere. The British did it, and see how well it worked for them: poverty and mass unemployment almost everywhere outside the southeast, and now calamity in London as well.

The Economist had an excellent article on this very topic a month ago that similarly concludes:

There is no need to make a fetish of manufacturing, even when finance is in such bad odour. Industrial economies such as Germany are suffering too. But the success of Rolls-Royce suggests that the world will not be neatly divided into firms (or countries) that make things and those that sell services. Flying high depends on being able to do both.
 
Toronto, I think, can survive without its manufacturing base. The biggest obstacle to a successful creative class is the timidity of the Canadian creative industry. Our creative class is so often self-perceived to be a creative second-class, we're so often beholden to the US (and less often Europe).
 
Manufacturing/aka, a balanced economy is a must. Where are all the entrepreneurs creating new products to manufacture?

China, Vietnam, Mexico, India... Depends on the product, but for products like the IPod or those Lacoste shirts, the actual manufacturing of the product makes up a trivial part of the overall value compared to RD, engineering, marketing, distribution and financing. Obviously that wouldn't apply to something like screw drivers, but chances are we wouldn't be competitive at making those anyways.
 
It would be a grave mistake to abandon our industrial sector in the hopes of new jobs elsewhere. The British did it, and see how well it worked for them: poverty and mass unemployment almost everywhere outside the southeast, and now calamity in London as well.

Then again, if one thinks of "outside the southeast", it may be argued that places like Manchester, Glasgow, etc have already gone through that process and are actually *better off* now than a bottomed-out quarter century ago...
 
Heavy manufacturing will probably never come back to Southern Ontario, but, Richard Florida neglects the importance of the trades. Those who lose their jobs in manufacturing plants arent all going to become Urban Studies professors! Nor would that be desirable, trades such as construction, plumbing and carpentry are necessary even in a 'creative' economy.
 

Back
Top