Did a loop from College Park, to MLG to Ryerson to Dundas Square/Eatons Centre/Massey Hall to Nathan Phillips and then the AGO
College park was a waste. We waited for a good 20 mins for zombies, and the only exciting thing to happen was an impromptu wave that the crowd managed to get to go around the pond a good dozen times or so. We decided it just wasn't worth wasting more time on and left.
I have to agree that the "art" in MLG was horrible, but just being in the building was really cool. I've never been in there, so it was fantastic to see. Most people outside of the arena were asking if it was worth doing and most of the answers from people simply involved getting to go inside the arena. Most people didn't care about the "art".
Ryerson had some okay stuff. Ducks in Lake Devo and an alley way with book pages stuck to the wall. There was some sort of aluminum robot on Victoria as well, but it was impossible to get close to it at the time. Looked neat from across the road though.
Dundas Square was a waste. The idea of shining a spotlight on people in a place that is so lit up it makes you feel like its noon was in hindsight a bad idea.
The jello blob in the Eaton Centre looked cheap and even from different vantage points never really came across as anything cool. It just looked like something you'd see at Ikea.
Massey Hall had a makeshift ceiling put up within the alleyway. There was symbolism there, and you could take some cool pictures as there was a lot of random junk all over the place (old type writers, binders, office supplies). I think it was what I expected.
Nathan Phillips Square was by far the highlight. It was fantastic to see and when we were there we saw some pong and space invaders being played on the buildings. I found it was similar to the Pulse from last year's luminato in terms of its attractiveness.
OCAD was ok. People were taping their own drawings on pieces of paper to everything. Next door there was a really cool shadow demonstration with an exercise bike hooked up to a projector. Anyone could go up and ride the bike and the shadows/projection made it look like the rider was on a horse. The projector was set up to alternate images as the rider peddled to make it look like it was galloping. It was pretty cool.
Like last year, this was hit or miss. I found that the descriptions/pictures in the books and on the websites really made things sound and look a lot better than they were. Looking at the picture in the program of the blob thing in the Eaton Centre, they're hardly the same thing. Same goes for many others. I know they have to sell it and I know that the artists are proud of their work, so they're going to hype it up, but all it does is cause a let down.
I'm sure other sections had hit or miss projects as well, but by the time we got to AGO we didn't feel excited enough about the night to continue on.
I'll put some pictures up later.