AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
#BREAKING Adamson BBQ owner Adam Skelly was just taken away in handcuffs by Toronto police.
About time, though I am sure he will get bail and go back at it.
AoD
#BREAKING Adamson BBQ owner Adam Skelly was just taken away in handcuffs by Toronto police.
Things are escalating. The Queen’s Park protest is heading to Etobicoke. Protestors are trying to enter the BBQ place. Randy Hillier has been fined for organizing a gathering.
The law and order bunch seem to be going wild when law and order is taken seriously.
AoD
But I am concerned with gross inconsistency in the application of the public health regulations that doesn't seem to be based on science.
I think you have a point, but the issue with indoor dining is that you don't wear masks in the restaurant when eating. Schools and other indoor facilities are requiring masks from my understanding. This isn't what I personally believe, but if anything, the argument is more applicable for a small retailer where their customers are shopping masked and socially distanced, whereas a school is still open (also masked and socially distanced).
I think you have a point, but the issue with indoor dining is that you don't wear masks in the restaurant when eating. Schools and other indoor facilities are requiring masks from my understanding. This isn't what I personally believe, but if anything, the argument is more applicable for a small retailer where their customers are shopping masked and socially distanced, whereas a school is still open (also masked and socially distanced).
Warning: do not read the replies!Mayor of Guelph telling people from lockdown area's to stay out of Guelph. I knew people were going to do non essential travel to other zones. Especially so close to Christmas.
Is it though?
In reading the SCOTUS decision this morning; and keeping in mind we don't have the same Constitution, or laws in Canada; but we do have similar legal principles.
I'm not sure the order to close would withstand a legal challenge here. (which is the route he should have taken).
Can you reasonably allow schools to remain open; and more to the point, indoor, non-food, big box retail; and then order outdoor dining closed, without presenting epidemiological evidence in support of same?
I'm not arguing for indoor dining, nor for the tactics of Mr. Skelley.
But I am concerned with gross inconsistency in the application of the public health regulations that doesn't seem to be based on science.
If it is; the evidence should be presented; if not, then I would argue the closure should be struck as a capricious act outside the scope of government authority.
Lets be honest, the owner here and many of his backers come off as wing-nuts worthy of the anti-vaxxer crowd for whom i have no time.
But that doesn't mean there isn't a legitimate question on the table; even if the way in which it has been posed is ill-conceived and poorly thought out.
Students in kindergarten to Grade 3 are encouraged, but not required, to wear non-medical or cloth masks in indoor spaces, including school transportation.
My niece chose not too, and pretty much only her Aunt (my wife) cares that she isn't.
Students must wear non-medical masks or face coverings while in school.The TDSB’s requirements are consistent with the City of Toronto requirementthat anyone aged two years and older must wear a mask/face covering in indoor public spaces, with possible exemptions. Toronto Public Health recommendsthat all students wear a mask/face covering while indoors at school. The requirement for all school board staff to wear medical masks follows the direction of the Ministry of Education.
The rules and policies are so haphazard that I'm not surprised that people are so frustrated. I don't condone opening up indoor dining by any means, but the Ontario gov't needs to get their act together. It's never too late.
About time, though I am sure he will get bail and go back at it.
AoD
Is it though?
In reading the SCOTUS decision this morning; and keeping in mind we don't have the same Constitution, or laws in Canada; but we do have similar legal principles.
I'm not sure the order to close would withstand a legal challenge here. (which is the route he should have taken).
Can you reasonably allow schools to remain open; and more to the point, indoor, non-food, big box retail; and then order outdoor dining closed, without presenting epidemiological evidence in support of same?
I'm not arguing for indoor dining, nor for the tactics of Mr. Skelley.
But I am concerned with gross inconsistency in the application of the public health regulations that doesn't seem to be based on science.
If it is; the evidence should be presented; if not, then I would argue the closure should be struck as a capricious act outside the scope of government authority.
Lets be honest, the owner here and many of his backers come off as wing-nuts worthy of the anti-vaxxer crowd for whom i have no time.
But that doesn't mean there isn't a legitimate question on the table; even if the way in which it has been posed is ill-conceived and poorly thought out.