A
alklay
Guest
(From my post from another thread)
The Globe has decent coverage and Barber has a decent article but sadly, they are not accessible on the web.
And even more sadly, the four designs are not on the city website (and there is no feature for public input). I find it impossible to fully understand the concepts from newspaper articles and thus I am off to City Hall sometime today to get a better understanding of the designs.
On a side note, unless the winning design has a permanent stage incorporated into the site, we will end up with the same clutter/mess that the present square suffers from (cheap looking temporary stages that are constantly being put up and taken down and moved). We need a decent permanent stage sooner than we need aqueducts or glass-enclosed public rooms with fireplaces.
The Globe has decent coverage and Barber has a decent article but sadly, they are not accessible on the web.
And even more sadly, the four designs are not on the city website (and there is no feature for public input). I find it impossible to fully understand the concepts from newspaper articles and thus I am off to City Hall sometime today to get a better understanding of the designs.
On a side note, unless the winning design has a permanent stage incorporated into the site, we will end up with the same clutter/mess that the present square suffers from (cheap looking temporary stages that are constantly being put up and taken down and moved). We need a decent permanent stage sooner than we need aqueducts or glass-enclosed public rooms with fireplaces.