News   May 09, 2024
 176     0 
News   May 09, 2024
 449     1 
News   May 08, 2024
 1.8K     4 

McGuinty says 'No' to sharia law

Whose law? The Inuit? Cree? The aboriginals who lived here ten thousand years ago but were replaced by other Native populations?

If you took the time and read The Arbitration Act, you'd see that "aboriginal law" is the exact phrased used in it. Yes, there were many aboriginal groups in what is now Ontario, but most were united by the time that Europeans came (the Iroquois Confederacy) and most villages all practiced the same basic law.
 
For some reason when people here the word Muslim, every alarm bell is raised. Nobody is trying to create a “mini-Iran†here; though it seemingly has become the predominant belief in the minds of many.

It is important to remember that if Sharia Law were to have been established, it would not hold any power over the Canadian Charter. Every single ruling would have had to be inline with Canadian arbitration, and thus would not be able to supersede it. So it is, in fact, a case of a demographic adapting to the Canadian standards of morality and ethics.

If the courts were given a chance, perhaps the Sharia Law employed in Canada would act as inspiration to others in the Muslim world to acclimatize their legal codes to more liberal standards. Instead, the Mcguinty government shut it down; disregarding the fact decisions can be appealed to the civil courts; that government monitoring would be in place so as to ensure that women’s rights aren’t trampled; and that there would be an equal number of women on each panel to hear each case.

I understand the plight of women who may have suffered under the rule of perverted idiots from despotic regimes, but people have to understand that Sharia Law in Canada would have no resemblance with such a system except in name. If, after monitoring, the courts were deemed to be inherently biased, then by all means disband and reissue all cases to the Canadian civil courts. Instead what happened hear was fear mongering – people claiming that this Country would be converted to a “mini-Iran.â€
 
The trouble is that elimination of religious arbitration came right after the request by Muslims for equal treatment as Christians, Jews and First Nations peoples with similar arbitration councils. It was difficult to watch the whole process unfold when some critics resorted to making references about the Taliban when speaking about Sharia. Were they suggesting that Muslims who supported version of Sharia were just like the Taliban?

And while we are on the topic of Canadian legal system, historically speaking it does not have a shining history with respect to womens rights. This is only a recent development.
 

Back
Top