News   Nov 07, 2024
 745     0 
News   Nov 07, 2024
 302     0 
News   Nov 07, 2024
 828     2 

Mayor John Tory's Toronto

Bluffs Nation :)

In all honestly - I'd rather be affiliated with Scarborough than the snootiness of the Beaches!!

[The Beaches is a neighbourhood in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is so named because of its four beaches situated on Lake Ontario. It is located east of downtown within the "Old" City of Toronto.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beaches
[...]
In the old City of Toronto the area was known as Ward 9.
[...]

Wikipedia
 
Scarborough would likely go bankrupt on its own. And this guy think Scarbexit will lead to lower taxes and better services????

Somebody has to still pay for those traffic lights they want inside of the crosswalk.

CyYa1IMXcAIRXlv.jpg:large


And if that sidewalk gets cracked by the tree roots, it would need replacing before its expected expiry date.
 
An "independent" Scarborough would be dependent for a lot of things. Transit, police/fire/EMT, libraries, etc. …

In fact, an independent Scarborough would automatically mean the re-establishment of some form of Metro, with the remainder of Toronto holding all the cards over all those files mentioned. An independent Scarborough would be regularly drubbed at such Metro council meetings.

The only way to avoid such a situation would be this Scarborough establishing its own entities (with all the cost and duplication that implies), which would hardly carry much appeal to many small-c conservatives there. Especially as creating a Scarborough Transit Commission would create the very barriers and duplication on transit that Scarborough politicians have railed against.

If an independent Scarborough wants any more subways, it's going to have to pay for them itself. The province or the federal government are assuredly not going to be granting every single wish Scarborough has. Given any Scarborough City Council would quickly run out of fat to cut, user fees or property tax hikes would be inevitable. If city council balked at such things, an independent Scarborough would be in pretty much the same position as it was when in Toronto: wanting all the things, but refusing to consider any meaningful measures to pay for them. Except now they couldn't blame downtown, and different parts of Scarborough would turn on each other.

It's almost as if the people wanting an independent Scarborough haven't thought it through. At all. Could it be?
 
An "independent" Scarborough would be dependent for a lot of things. Transit, police/fire/EMT, libraries, etc. …

In fact, an independent Scarborough would automatically mean the re-establishment of some form of Metro, with the remainder of Toronto holding all the cards over all those files mentioned. An independent Scarborough would be regularly drubbed at such Metro council meetings.

The only way to avoid such a situation would be this Scarborough establishing its own entities (with all the cost and duplication that implies), which would hardly carry much appeal to many small-c conservatives there. Especially as creating a Scarborough Transit Commission would create the very barriers and duplication on transit that Scarborough politicians have railed against.

If an independent Scarborough wants any more subways, it's going to have to pay for them itself. The province or the federal government are assuredly not going to be granting every single wish Scarborough has. Given any Scarborough City Council would quickly run out of fat to cut, user fees or property tax hikes would be inevitable. If city council balked at such things, an independent Scarborough would be in pretty much the same position as it was when in Toronto: wanting all the things, but refusing to consider any meaningful measures to pay for them. Except now they couldn't blame downtown, and different parts of Scarborough would turn on each other.

It's almost as if the people wanting an independent Scarborough haven't thought it through. At all. Could it be?
A hybrid solution falling somewhere between Metro Toronto and The Megacity would be make more sense.
 
It's time to welcome the preliminary details of John Tory's 2017 austerity budget... includes the firing of 545 city staff.

newtwitterav_normal.jpg
Matt Elliott@GraphicMatt
2 mins ago
2017's 2% residential budgetary property tax increase will work out to increase of $8 a month for ~$600K homeowner.

I'm just starting to learn about what's in the proposed budget, and for now all I can say is that I am deeply ashamed with this city and all it's citizens who allow this to happen. What a disgrace.
 
Here's a list of just some of the proposed cuts.


CzASTo_WIAMJH51.jpg

CzASVPuXAAAwPFp.jpg






And these items were once planned for but are no longer included in the budget.

CzAY-BzUUAA7_e4.jpg

CzAY_dHUAAEzirk.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CzASTo_WIAMJH51.jpg
    CzASTo_WIAMJH51.jpg
    199.3 KB · Views: 484
  • CzASVPuXAAAwPFp.jpg
    CzASVPuXAAAwPFp.jpg
    194.3 KB · Views: 434
  • CzAY_dHUAAEzirk.jpg
    CzAY_dHUAAEzirk.jpg
    117.3 KB · Views: 453
  • CzAY-BzUUAA7_e4.jpg
    CzAY-BzUUAA7_e4.jpg
    156.6 KB · Views: 428
Hopefully council has the guts to vote down some of the more egregious ones and vote for a tax hike to keep our levels of service.

We already saw what cuts did to the TTC over this summer. This is probably the last year that cuts can be made without a noticeable decline in service.
 

Back
Top