UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
I get that. It's just it's pretty evident from all the need to "cut waste" from the budget narrative, there was really never any waste to begin with...and our parks, among many other things have suffered for it. Fiscal responsibility is about allocating money towards things that are needed...and in not doing so, it has become its own form of waste in the irony. Therefore, it isn't rocket science if we wish to build more parks, the money is not only needed to build it soundly but maintaining it too.There is a need for more park space, even as too much of what's there is underfunded. The City is growing exponentially and buying land is unlikely to get any cheaper. There is also a dedicated power (S.42) that requires parkland or cash-in-lieu from most large rezoning applications.
The thing is, Parks needs to improve its technical expertise in design; both to elevate it, but also to be conscious how it will be maintained in real-word conditions. The cost of that maintenance needs to be funded by Council, each and every time a new park is approved.
Last edited: