evandyk
Senior Member
The article really doesn't explain the issue very well. They hint at it with the quote from the booze companies:
But they don't explain that the reason the companies have lower prices in other provinces is because the LCBO itself won't allow them to have a lower price in Ontario.
Josh Rubin knows this stuff. I wonder if he didn't have enough time to write it down, or some editor cut it out?
“The disputed provision would inflate retail liquor prices across Canada to an unreasonable extent, by requiring suppliers to raise prices they charge in other jurisdictions,” the booze companies argue in an application to toss out the clause.
But they don't explain that the reason the companies have lower prices in other provinces is because the LCBO itself won't allow them to have a lower price in Ontario.
Josh Rubin knows this stuff. I wonder if he didn't have enough time to write it down, or some editor cut it out?