buildup
Senior Member
It's increasingly hard to dissect this odd rift. The police were blocked from participating in the LBGT Parade by BLM (despite the fact the BLM narrative is not applicable to Canada, nor the Parade itself), then the ban was extended as activists attempt to pin responsibility for the serial homicides on the police rather than Mr. MacArthur. It also seems to me BLM now speaks on behalf of LBGT community?
The police solved the MacArthur crimes, that is good, also the Chief was correct in saying information from the community could've solved this faster. That is demonstrably true. Finally NOW magazine joins the fray by rehashing the bathhouse raids of 1981 (2 generations ago) and a couple of other very minor events. It seems to be grand-standing and attention seeking by 1% of the BLM and LBGT community.
If you didn't elect these aggrieved, narcissistic activists, tell them to stop speaking on your behalf?
The police solved the MacArthur crimes, that is good, also the Chief was correct in saying information from the community could've solved this faster. That is demonstrably true. Finally NOW magazine joins the fray by rehashing the bathhouse raids of 1981 (2 generations ago) and a couple of other very minor events. It seems to be grand-standing and attention seeking by 1% of the BLM and LBGT community.
If you didn't elect these aggrieved, narcissistic activists, tell them to stop speaking on your behalf?