Bayer
Senior Member
Unfortunately, we need homeless shelters, and frankly, I am more interested in the needs of those who have nothing than in the aspirations of developers, who have the rest of the city to exploit.
Unfortunately, we need homeless shelters, and frankly, I am more interested in the needs of those who have nothing than in the aspirations of developers, who have the rest of the city to exploit.
Unfortunately, we need homeless shelters, and frankly, I am more interested in the needs of those who have nothing than in the aspirations of developers, who have the rest of the city to exploit.
Did you even read this thread before making your uniformed post. Not one single person has stated that we don't need homeless shelters, they have instead correctly asserted that they should be spread throughout the city so as not to form a getto. Better for the city, and better for the homeless, as hoplessness surrounded by hoplessness only begets more hopelessness.
The question I pose is: is Dundas East transforming or would it be better to describe the phenomenon as a general rise in tides spilling over and lifting up Dundas East with it?
For example it could be argued that Leslieville is an example of transformation not just spill-over because it has changed both physically and in our imaginations. It is no longer just a down on it's luck area upwind of the largest sewage treatment facility in the country, it is now a model of young urban professional gentrification and we just ignore the rest.