Still off topic, but Mongo, would you please post the source for that list? I want to send its author a threatening* letter.
42
*hollow threats only, I can assure you. Well, really, I just want to know more about how the list has been all messed up.
This is definitely going OT; I would not be surprised if these posts end up in General Discussions.
All I have is a document from several years ago. I have long since forgotten where I copied it from, and ten minutes Googling has failed to come up with the site.
The 18 categories of classical music on my document are:
ORCHESTRA
Symphony Orchestra (large)
Stage Orchestra (medium)
Standing Orchestra (small)
ORCHESTRA & INSTRUMENT(S)
Keyboard Instrument & Orchestra
String Instrument & Orchestra
Other Instrument & Orchestra
Multiple Instruments & Orchestra
CHAMBER MUSIC
Chamber Music: Five to Nine Players
Chamber Music: Four Players
Chamber Music: Three Players
Chamber Music: Two Players
SOLO INSTRUMENT
Solo Piano
Solo Non-Piano Keyboard Instrument
Solo Non-Keyboard Instrument
STAGE
Ballets
Operas & Operettas
VOCAL / CHORAL
Sacred Vocal / Choral Music
Secular Vocal / Choral Music
For each category, the composer was rated as follows:
3 - considerable significant work in that category
2 - some significant work in that category
1 - minor work in that category
0 - no work in that category
I had awarded points on the basis of 3 points for a '3' and 1 point for a '2', with no points for a '1' or a '0'.
In addition, the total volume of the composer's lifetime body of work was rated on the document as 'small', 'moderate', 'large' or 'huge', and I awarded 1 point for 'small', 2 points for 'moderate', 4 points for 'large' and 7 points for 'huge'
For example, Mozart had the listing 333-3333-3333-322-23-33 'huge body of work', which gives 55 points (15x3 points plus 3x1 points plus 7 points = 55 points)
The top 9 composers, using that point system:
55 points 333-3333-3333-322-23-33 'huge body of work' Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
41 points 332-3302-3333-310-23-32 'large body of work' Beethoven, Ludwig van
41 points 322-2332-2332-330-02-33 'huge body of work' Haydn, Franz Joseph
39 points 303-3302-3333-320-00-33 'large body of work' Brahms, Johannes
38 points 023-3223-2331-030-03-33 'huge body of work' Handel, Georg Frideric
36 points 003-3323-2222-033-00-33 'huge body of work' Bach, Johann Sebastian
35 points 322-0200-3333-301-02-33 'huge body of work' Schubert, Franz
32 points 333-3300-2222-200-33-22 'large body of work' Tchaikovsky, Pyotr Il'yich
30 points 333-3302-2222-220-01-32 'large body of work' Mendelssohn, Felix
The other composers mentioned in the above posts:
26 points 222-2222-2222-203-22-22 'huge body of work' Villa-Lobos, Heitor
25 points 222-2222-2222-222-22-22 'huge body of work' Milhaud, Darius
24 points 023-2120-0223-302-23-03 'moderate body of work' Debussy, Claude
24 points 223-0322-2212-220-12-32 'large body of work' Elgar, Edward
22 points 322-2202-2322-200-22-02 'large body of work' Shostakovich, Dmitry
21 points 032-0010-2220-020-03-33 'large body of work' Purcell, Henry
21 points 222-2222-2222-222-12-22 'large body of work' Kreneck, Ernst
This system is not perfect, of course, but in my opinion it at least allows composers who are not 'famous' to be directly and impartially compared with the more well-known composers.
Bill