News   Jul 15, 2024
 315     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 459     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 1.9K     1 

Gonzales' resigns as U.S. Attorney General

Ummagumma66

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
331
Reaction score
263
from canoe.ca http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2007/08/27/4449772-ap.html

Gonzales' resignation offers hope for critics who say he eroded civil liberties
By BETH GORHAM





WASHINGTON (CP) - The resignation of U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales provided some fresh hope Monday for those who say he presided over a tragic erosion of civil liberties and international respect for American justice.

As legal counsel to President George W. Bush and later in cabinet, Gonzales was a major force behind such contentious anti-terror tactics as the rendition of people like Canadian Maher Arar to third countries and the widely condemned legal system for Guantanamo Bay prisoners, including another Canadian, Omar Khadr.

The first Hispanic in the job, Gonzales, 52, said in a short statement that leading the U.S. Justice Department had been one of his "greatest privilieges" and that he'd lived the American dream.

But he's been under siege almost constantly since arriving in Washington in 2001 after serving as a judge on the Texas Supreme Court and as an adviser to Bush when he was Texas governor.

In a memo to the president the following year, Gonzales appeared to condone some forms of torture for prisoners that many saw as encouragement for abuses at Guantanamo and Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison.

He also defended the practice of transferring terror suspects to other countries to face harsh interrogation and prison. It's that policy that allowed U.S. officials to ship Arar from New York to his native Syria, where he was tortured.


Accused of lying to Congress about the warrantless domestic spying program he supported and his role in the firing of several U.S. attorneys last year, allegedly for partisan reasons, politicians from both parties have been trying for months to get him booted from his job.

"This is an opportunity," said Mark Agrast, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress think-tank.

"But it really does depend on their willingness to turn over a new leaf."

Gonzales has consistently pushed for wider presidential powers, earning the emnity of those who regarded him as Bush's crony and not the kind of independent defender who could command respect and uphold the law for Americans.

The president defended him to the end, although he grudgingly accepted his resignation on the weekend.

"After months of unfair treatment that has created a harmful distraction at the Justice Department, Judge Gonzales decided to resign his position," said Bush.

"It's sad that we live in a time when a talented and honourable person like (him) is impeded from doing important work because his good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons."

Gonzales drafted the rules for the military war tribunals at the U.S. prison camp in Cuba, seeking to limit the legal rights of detainees. He famously called the Geneva Conventions that protect prisoners of war "quaint."

Most western countries except Canada have complained about the troubled system, saying it's a haphazard, horrifying process unfairly slanted toward prosecutors.

Now, with Defence Minister Robert Gates openly critical of the prison camp, and a new attorney general coming in, "one at least begins to see the possibility of cooler heads prevailing," said Agrast.

"I can't think of anyone who brought such disgrace on the office. One doesn't like to think our attorney general is a liar or an idiot. People just couldn't take him seriously. It was a travesty."

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, a former appeals court judge and assistant attorney general, has been touted as a successor.

"Many of us have some doubts about (him)," said Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, who notes that Chertoff's department has faced its share of criticism.

"It's possible but it's hardly a slam dunk."

The most important thing, said Schumer, is that the successor put the rule of law above politics.

"Now it will be up to the White House to choose a replacement who is, above all, a professional, not a partisan, not a pal. Unlike the last time, (Bush) needs to pick the best person, not his best friend."

The Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, which spearheaded court challenges for basic legal rights on behalf of Guantanamo detainees, said this resignation is only the beginning.

"Guantanamo continues, as do torture, wiretapping, secret CIA sites, rendition, and illegal trials," the centre said in a release.

"Congress can and should do all of these things, but so far, it has been silent."

The American Civil Liberties Union said the fact that Gonzales is leaving doesn't pardon Bush's "systematic abuse of power."

"Congress must not accept Gonzales as the administration's latest sacrificial lamb. Congress must conduct more oversight and restore our Constitution, our world status and American values," said the union's Caroline Fredrickson.

Bush has lost a steady stream of top loyalists recently as his presidency winds down, incuding adviser Karl Rove earlier this month.

It would help, said Agrast, to appoint someone who served as attorney general in a previous administration and could set the chaotic department in order quickly in the year and a few months that Bush has left.

"You'd have to have somebody that's such a distinguished person the appointment by itself says it's a new day," he said.

"You'd have to be crazy to want the job. Crazy, but also a patriot."
 
This is all the rage on the WNY board. Alberto Gonzales has been tracked for some time via the reportage of the NY Times. Gonzales has been exposed, through past actions, to be an archetypical sycophant of the highest order - a "Bushie" all too willing to please his commander-in-chief before and after becoming the Attorney General - with widescale wire-tapping of more Americans than any terrorism would have justified, and a willingness to ignore the constitutional implications of politically-motivated firings that went beyond the pale of even the most agregiously acceptable sleaze.

In the meantime, Bush's presidency shrinks to its lowest level, more befitting, as it were, his likely legacy. With only "Condi" and Cheney to prop him up, however shakily, it looks bleak indeed for the remainder of his term. Gone are Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, and now Gonzales in joining the ranks of the resigned - the last two may continue momentarily under the shadow of possible indictments for their actions, but with the power and willingness to use the pardon, there is nothing for these two to fear.

Never known to have a solid command of the language, George is more inarticulate of late than per usual. He is probably feeling quite isolated after his failed "surges" to quell violence in Iraq. Like Democrats, an increasing number of Republicans who were never "on the fence," are open questioning Bush, not only on the war or his many appointments, but even such issues as Hurricane Katrina (which naggingly continues to be a national disgrace). Under these circumstances, Gonzales is but a blip on the radar scene. That country looks to be exhausted with this administration at every turn, and probably anxious to move on within their more rigid method of handling regime change.

I hope the American people don't get it wrong again, when they get their next chance to right the ship.
 
Rove, Snow, Gonzales...

Darth Cheney is up to something - as always, I sense his foul hand behind these movements (note that Rove & Gonzales are Bush's boys, not the Dark Lord's). This may look like an implosion, but I suspect it's a purge, in preparation for... something. Paranoia level escalating - this is maneuvering. They are not nearly finished yet - something big is coming.
 
Rove, Snow, Gonzales...

Darth Cheney is up to something - as always, I sense his foul hand behind these movements (note that Rove & Gonzales are Bush's boys, not the Dark Lord's). This may look like an implosion, but I suspect it's a purge, in preparation for... something. Paranoia level escalating - this is maneuvering. They are not nearly finished yet - something big is coming.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/10905

...if you need to add to the paranoia:)
 
Broadly Speaking

Reagan, Bush, Mulroney in Canada, they represent the pendulum swinging back, as it must also swing forward, when left undisturbed. There are characteristic negative aspects of one swing as there will be of the other.

National Republican Party control in America, when the pendulum swings that way, is often built on conservative to right-wing platforms the last few decades. This is a party that usually wants to control government by stripping it down and turning off the spigot of tax funding to undesirable programmes, but they reserve two main exceptions to this rule - the military and business. The moral centre of that party is in effect to tell people how to live their life within precepts they claim are Christian. It is at best a few subsets of Christianity, often infused with literalist leaning ideas. Their policies come off as anti-minorities (but not just racial), anti-abortion, anti-evolution, anti-crime, pro-patriotic, pro-Big-Oil, pro-military, pro-censorship etc. Of course, there are exceptions, but these exceptions will be somewhat on the fringe of the party.

Bush, Cheney, Rice and the rest of the gang in current executive power, broadly speaking, are more likely to be caught with their pants/dress down on wiretaps, creating false pretenses to go to war, negligence toward civil rights issues, than national Democrats. Democratic scandals topically start with sex, because that is what Republicans will ferret out first, but while they may overlap, they are usually of a different sort.

Prior to Gonzales, there was the spectre of Ashcroft who was doing some of the same things, almost as enthusiastically as Gonzales, but without the painted smile and otherwise mild countenance. Gonzales was not a puller-of-strings, but rather a man on the end of the strings, being pulled. Yes Cheney is more of the former type; some say he pulled from the outset the strings of the president himself. But Gonzales' string-puller was really Karl Rove, based on what we know to date. Without Rove, perhaps Gonzales would not have been so destined to get into so much trouble. Once Rove was gone, Gonzales who had done what he was told, had no one left to control him, or indeed use him. His earlier resistance to resigning had all the earmarks of Rove, rather than Gonzales himself. Part of Bush's hardcore battles that reflected his supposed stubborn resistance were also extensions of Rove's advice. The rest may be more the Cheney effect, especially on military matters. The not so subtle shift from Afghanistan to Iraq for the war on terror was more Cheney, although he took advantage of Bush's own predilection. Ever present in the wings, and now amped up to distract the gullible in the public, is the next threat - Iran - that should carry us out to the end of this presidency.
 
Good riddance to bad rubbish. Though I worry about who his replacement will be. The AG office was held previously by John Ashcroft, not exactly a friend of civil liberties. Bush may replace Gonzales with someone more draconian. Thus, Bush's AGs could go from bad to worse to worst before this administration's term ends in January 2009.
 
Good thing Bush is a lame duck at this point. Senate will be able to stop any AG appointment they don't like.
 
He's lame, but he's still in power. There's plenty of opportunities for him to make more of a mess.
 

Back
Top