mpd618
Active Member
Sure, but you would have thought that they or local journos printing the stories about upcoming service would have been able to discern that GO is not, yet, a weekends and off-peak rail service.
The stories had all the details. But the public expectations may be different in places that are and aren't bedroom communities of Toronto - and Kitchener falls squarely in the latter category.
I also think that, in general, the general public's perception of what is an affordable train connection (from anywhere really) is out of synch with what GO can, and does, offer. There is one lady here in our office who was excited when she heard about the K-W extension ... she became less enthusiastic and declared "well if it takes 2 hours and costs more than $10....who would use it!".
Driving is just as expensive (gas alone is the same as a GO round trip), and more stressful. It may take longer, but time in a train is not as useless as and is more pleasant than long car commutes. So I think some people who make the commute already will use it - but both endpoints need to be easy to reach.
I just think that the farther out you go, the less likely you are to be able to offer the kind of service at the kind of price that the commuting/travelling public is expecting....so the "capture rates" are likely going to be less.
I understand your point, though I'm not sure I've seen much interest on GO's part to invest in better service as opposed to more service area and more capacity. What the Kitchener extension may do is help GO realize that there is a world out there beyond peak-hour suburb-to-CBD service. The "reverse-peak" (as GO thinks of it) travel into Kitchener is just as high as the "peak" commute out of it. Maybe having the market bring them to understanding the needs of an intercity service will spur GO to apply the ideas to the inner GTA. Ultimately, I would like to see GO serving an S-Bahn type role for the entire GTHA.